Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
6. that suggests that our congresscritters are our bosses. To that, I say
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 05:15 PM
Dec 2011

NO
FUCKING
WAY.

Sure many of them succumb to the "Inside The Bloatway Disease" where they start believing their own press releases, and believe that they are actually powerful, important P E O P L E. That happens a lot to most congresscritters. Funny, but senators seem to be slightly more immune to that disease, but also cannot help to suffer from close association with "power" and being in the center of government.

Not that they polled the question closely back then, but I believe that the dive in support and trust in congress is closely associated with this corrupt, cretinous, callous, corpulent, creep who took over congress in the 80s. Eventually, he was such a turd in the punch bowl, that even his own party ended up tossing out of his leadership position. I forgot what he is doing now, but I understand that he was a Historian for Freddie and Fannie for a time, and that he has a huge account at Tiffany's.

Their true job is to represent us. Not lead us. there is a huge difference.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When I have a 9% approval rating at my job [View all] Fire Walk With Me Dec 2011 OP
A-fucking-Men!! Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #1
That's because you're not the boss. Lots of managers have ratings that low. saras Dec 2011 #2
that suggests that our congresscritters are our bosses. To that, I say ChairmanAgnostic Dec 2011 #6
Huh? abelenkpe Dec 2011 #8
Where do you work because that's not the case where I work lunatica Dec 2011 #17
Bummer abelenkpe Dec 2011 #19
+1 Sherman A1 Dec 2011 #21
You don't have to fool all the people all the time... Bucky Dec 2011 #3
Perhaps the saddest truth yet. BeHereNow Dec 2011 #5
American memes: If you're not succeeding you're not screwing the other guy... TheMadMonk Dec 2011 #16
Problem is, how? They are like roaches- they just keep coming. BeHereNow Dec 2011 #4
Boxer? abelenkpe Dec 2011 #9
Read it and weep... I believed in her for decades! BeHereNow Dec 2011 #11
Aaaauuuuuggggh!!!! abelenkpe Dec 2011 #18
At will employment means you can get fired for a 99% approval rating too. ANY TIME, no reason patrice Dec 2011 #7
Not if you have a contract. sulphurdunn Dec 2011 #30
Time to send that one to our "representatives" onethatcares Dec 2011 #10
they won't care... awoke_in_2003 Dec 2011 #25
We would get fired long before it sunk to 9% liberal N proud Dec 2011 #12
How many of them folks in that picture come from the working class? nt Modern_Matthew Dec 2011 #13
as they sit unionworks Dec 2011 #14
9% is misleading. People generally think Congress sucks - except for their Representative. Alexander Dec 2011 #15
Yup. n/t progressoid Dec 2011 #23
Just read an article that spoke to exactly that: My Congressman can beat up your Congressman gtar100 Dec 2011 #26
Also, everyone hates pork projects, unless it's THEIR pork project. Odin2005 Dec 2011 #29
Only 242 of them need to be fired. baldguy Dec 2011 #20
so can Dem conventions NOW have signs with zip codes & local Dem clubs too, to sign up voters StarsInHerHair Dec 2011 #22
As good an illustration as any how it's not a "job" treestar Dec 2011 #24
As good an illustration as any how it's not a "job" AlbertCat Dec 2011 #31
RWers I talk to actually tried to claim Cain's experience as CEO constituted treestar Dec 2011 #32
that text is possibly clever enough to go on a Big Dog shirt BOG PERSON Dec 2011 #27
Unless you are the CEO getting mega-bucks. Odin2005 Dec 2011 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When I have a 9% approval...»Reply #6