Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Wounded Bear

(64,025 posts)

5. Hey, there is no smoking at C-Link field in Seattle...

Reply to MineralMan (Original post)

Sat May 18, 2013, 01:20 PM

May 2013

and it's an outdoor stadium.

They still call it a building.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Thankfully, I quit many, many years ago, so I don't really care for myself.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

LTTE: Smoking at Vikings Stadium? [View all] MineralMan May 2013 OP

Well said MineralMan. russspeakeasy May 2013 #1

I agree olddots May 2013 #2

Surely the solution is to stop smoking, Nye Bevan May 2013 #3

Surely that is not the point of my post. MineralMan May 2013 #4

Perhaps a better answer etherealtruth May 2013 #8

That's how the taxes on tobacco products started out. MineralMan May 2013 #14

Yet accidents and abuse caused by alcohol consumption is ignored. glinda May 2013 #21

Hey, there is no smoking at C-Link field in Seattle... Wounded Bear May 2013 #5

Yes, well. A lot of people are forced to pay for MineralMan May 2013 #7

I'm still a bit ambivalent about how they financed the CLink... Wounded Bear May 2013 #10

Well, that at least makes some sense. It taxes MineralMan May 2013 #12

B-but... you said "Smoking!" dogknob May 2013 #11

Yes. It's interesting, I think, to see the responses. I knew it MineralMan May 2013 #13

Spot on. glinda May 2013 #22

There is logic expressed in your letter etherealtruth May 2013 #6

It would be stupid to allow smoking in a building with a clear roof. bluedigger May 2013 #9

A very interesting question you've raised about public expenditure of money to support corporations. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #15

Yes, your conundrum is a valid one. MineralMan May 2013 #16

Whaddya know MM...we agree on something!! Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #17

Oh, I'm betting we agree on more than you think. MineralMan May 2013 #18

We had the same "deal" when I was an Oregonian when they built The Rose Garden Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #19

The argument is that while we are... TreasonousBastard May 2013 #20

He doesn't own the Stadium does he? I thought it was the City. glinda May 2013 #23

I'm still pissed at all the non-smokers who expect me to pay for poor kids' health care. Comrade Grumpy May 2013 #24