Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Could Wind Turbines Be Toxic To The Ear? [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)198. Agreed - I think it would be very noisy
but the manufacturers aren't claiming it's quiet, as far as I can see. They claim it can, at least in theory, extract more energy (I suppose because it presents a larger surface area than the fans which only take up part of a circle).
I think Nadin lacthed onto it because 'bladeless', and the blades are what her homeowners' association is moaning about at the moment, and it wouldn't do to upset the readers by confronting their prejudices.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
240 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That would be the metastudy you linked to that concluded we don't know one way or the other?
winter is coming
May 2013
#163
What part of I want a few studies to confirm or debunk are you afraid off?
nadinbrzezinski
May 2013
#180
It's a bit disingenuous claiming the frequency response of a wind turbine is measured at the hub.
Hugin
May 2013
#174
Any comment on their claimed maximum of 100W from 100 square metres?
muriel_volestrangler
May 2013
#165
US wind power capacity is about 60,000 MWatts of which Shell is 550 MW and BP is 2600 MW
FarCenter
May 2013
#84
Of course there's an anti-wind power PR industry - it's talked about in your own link
muriel_volestrangler
May 2013
#67
The strange thing about that is that their patent application clearly does have blades
muriel_volestrangler
May 2013
#71
Unless they've applied for more than one, the patent application is more likely to be accurate. n/t
winter is coming
May 2013
#111
They also claim that their energy is storable, while that from turbines isn't.
MNBrewer
May 2013
#199
I would think that if one type is capable of storing energy, other types could be adapted. n/t
winter is coming
May 2013
#201
They *might* be saying that they could use the hydraulic pressure
muriel_volestrangler
May 2013
#203
Yup, that is why Shell is paying me to find THIS, which I mentioned during the day
nadinbrzezinski
May 2013
#31
+1,000 -- it's a paranoid scare tactic with a "think of the CHILDREN" line of horseshit, to boot!
MADem
May 2013
#46
The only thing that wind turbines "harm" is the bottom line of the corporate pigs in charge of
MADem
May 2013
#138
Also, headsets for cell phones. Some people seem to always wear a bluetooth device. n/t
winter is coming
May 2013
#45
"I want this study repeated, and then repeated some more, and confirmed or debunked."
winter is coming
May 2013
#168
Can anyone provide a link to any study done showing the safety of these turbines?
Hugin
May 2013
#63
If we had approached petroleum production and carbon emissions with some skepticism
loyalsister
May 2013
#64
People were once certain that traveling inside a train doing sixty miles an hour would flatten them.
Ikonoklast
May 2013
#88
Stephen Colbert explains wind turbine syndrome & says Obama will kill us all:
Honeycombe8
May 2013
#74
No cancer cluster has been confirmed. At this point, it's people thinking,
winter is coming
May 2013
#172
"including her husband,an anti-wind activist who compares his struggle to the civil rights movement"
redqueen
May 2013
#108
Well, if my husband refuses to review my papers, we won't be perpetuating science any time soon.
winter is coming
May 2013
#153
Check out the history of anti-wind power articles posted in the East County fishwrap...
SidDithers
May 2013
#115
NPR proved themselves to be willing to push a corporate agenda against public interest before Iraq.
redqueen
May 2013
#154
In the late 70s and early 80s, it was common "knowledge" that power lines cause cancer.
LiberalAndProud
May 2013
#216
It's the big blades that do that, right? Other designs don't produce those vibrations. nt
patrice
May 2013
#104
BLADLESS TURBINE MAKERS CLAIM TURBINES COULD PRODUCE MORE POWER WITH LESS PROBLEMS
SidDithers
May 2013
#125
Well, we know it can't mean "bladeless", because that design has blades
muriel_volestrangler
May 2013
#193
I Wondered Not Only about the Spelling but the Engineering Theory. How do you have a turbine w/ no..
dballance
May 2013
#210
It's a typo. They're actually vlad-less, a vast improvement over the turbines that use vampires.
winter is coming
May 2013
#224
Meta question. Can an online-only news outlet still be called a fishwrap?...
SidDithers
May 2013
#187
And, are the volunteer contributors (of articles) paid, or is it just a way to see their
bike man
May 2013
#221
Well you know how certain reporters like to put 100's of people on their ignore list.
Rex
May 2013
#226
No, the turbines themselves are not toxic, but 'some say' the low frequency sound generated
bike man
May 2013
#167