Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

W_HAMILTON

(10,332 posts)

5. Footnote 16, from your link:

Reply to dkf (Original post)

Sat May 18, 2013, 06:48 PM

May 2013

"We did not review the use of other named organizations on the BOLO listing to determine if their use was
appropriate."

The investigation was done at the behest of those in Congress that sought to determine if the IRS was "unfairly" targeting Tea Party groups. We do not know if the IRS targeted other groups since, as the footnote suggests, they did not investigate whether or not "other named organizations" on the BOLO listing were likewise "unfairly" targeted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The problem is the IRS BOLO list looks like it was aimed at conservatives. [View all] dkf May 2013 OP

If that's the case, then why were less than 1/3 of all 296 cases identified w/those keywords? Roland99 May 2013 #1

and why was the ONLY zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #3

Buy One Get One free? Bay Boy May 2013 #2

70 out of 300...sorry not buying it. Rex May 2013 #4

Footnote 16, from your link: W_HAMILTON May 2013 #5

The standard was improper. I fully believe this. However... Bolo Boffin May 2013 #6

The second problem is that these organizations were subjected to improper questions. dkf May 2013 #12

Which led to the main thing holding up the scrutiny: an internal request for a standardized letter Bolo Boffin May 2013 #15

I read one "burdensome" question was "Provide summaries of the books discussed in your meeting." John1956PA May 2013 #16

A link to the document is found on the following website Cirque du So-What May 2013 #7

Thanks for pointing to the website which originally posted the report. John1956PA May 2013 #8

I bet getting audited/reviewed will be held up as a badge of honor grok May 2013 #9

You should compile your numerous threads on this into one Kingofalldems May 2013 #10

. Rex May 2013 #11

It's all pieces of the puzzle. We don't know the entire picture yet. dkf May 2013 #13

For sake of context, I am posting snips from the I.G.'s report pages 6 & 7 quoted in the OP. John1956PA May 2013 #14

Golly. 99Forever May 2013 #17

Only if one doesn't read the TIGTA report carefully magellan May 2013 #18

The problem is that Republicans are unhinged, and MannyGoldstein May 2013 #19