where the f*ck is the media on this one?????

[Celebration]

19. Good grief

ABC News had to do a whole bunch of spinning to try to get themselves out of this one.

And, they are NOT saying that the White House released a bunch of doctored documents. They are only saying that in context that what they reported was correct, although the wording they reported was INACCURATE. Talk about spin! But even ABC and the source admit that their wording was incorrect. Yet you think this is in QUESTION??? REALLY??

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/more-details-on-benghazi-talking-points-emerge/

I asked my original source today to explain the different wording on the Ben Rhodes e-mail, and the fact that the words “State Department” were not included in the e-mail provided to CNN’s Tapper.

This was my source’s response, via e-mail: “WH reply was after a long chain of email about State Dept concerns. So when WH emailer says, take into account all equities, he is talking about the State equities, since that is what the email chain was about.”

The White House could still clear up this confusion by releasing the full e-mail transcripts that were provided for brief review by a select number of members of Congress earlier this year. If there’s “no ‘there’ there,” as President Obama himself claimed yesterday, a full release should help his case.

Of course the White House DID clear up the "confusion" but apparently that is not enough for some here. The source did NOT deny that his wording was incorrect.