General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Robert Reich: The Sad Spectacle of Obama’s Super PAC [View all]hay rick
(9,584 posts)One article here:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/us/politics/with-a-signal-to-donors-obama-yields-on-super-pacs.html?_r=1&hp
From the article:
Aides said the president had signed off on a plan to dispatch cabinet officials, senior advisers at the White House and top campaign staff members to deliver speeches on behalf of Mr. Obama at fund-raising events for Priorities USA Action, the leading Democratic super PAC, whose fund-raising has been dwarfed by Republican groups. The new policy was presented to the campaigns National Finance Committee in a call Monday evening and announced in an e-mail to supporters.
Were not going to fight this fight with one hand tied behind our back, Jim Messina, the manager of Mr. Obamas re-election campaign, said in an interview. With so much at stake, we cant allow for two sets of rules. Democrats cant be unilaterally disarmed.
Neither the president, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., nor their wives will attend fund-raising events or solicit donations for the Democratic group. A handful of officials from the administration and the campaign will appear on behalf of Mr. Obama, aides said, but will not directly ask for money.
The decision, which comes nine months before Election Day, escalates the money wars and is a milestone in Mr. Obamas evolving stances on political fund-raising. The lines have increasingly blurred between presidential campaigns and super PACs, which have flourished since a 2010 Supreme Court ruling and other legal and regulatory decisions made it easier for outside groups to raise unlimited donations to promote candidates.