Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)

9. I believe that all federal discrimination laws should have more teeth

Reply to loyalsister (Reply #7)

Sun May 19, 2013, 03:57 PM

May 2013

I also believe that sexual orientation should be included. I don't believe people should have to sue at all. They should be able to find meaningful remedies from the EEOC.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ADA is codified institutional discrimination [View all] loyalsister May 2013 OP

The damages issue is bad enough, but what happened to those who allowed this to go on Hoyt May 2013 #1

It was mostly legal loyalsister May 2013 #2

That is really sad. There should be an exception allowing tar and feathering is cases like this. nt Hoyt May 2013 #3

Indeed! loyalsister May 2013 #4

If there needs to be a cap -and I don't believe there does- why wasn't it based on some percentage? randome May 2013 #5

I'm not sure how it was calculated loyalsister May 2013 #8

All federal civil rights laws are limited Major Nikon May 2013 #6

Explain... loyalsister May 2013 #7

I believe that all federal discrimination laws should have more teeth Major Nikon May 2013 #9