General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, I guess you only want to talk to people who agree with you [View all]BainsBane
(57,775 posts)Insisting all women are "bitches" is perfectly fine, and to ban someone for that is trivial, whereas suggesting that certain members of a group find something to do with their time other than gossip about other DUers and call other members out in threads in which they are not participating (even though it was a clear violation of rules on DU2) constitutes an attack on the character of those members, unlike your own post above--the only purpose of which is to attack my character and stir up shit. All the while criticizing others for trivial banning. Really? And then there was this gem of yours referring to other members as "batshittery."
You do know the stuff about the sock isn't your concern?. That is the administrators decision to take action on, not yours. Your reference to my transparency page is gratuitous. I did not once have a post hidden in your group. That history bears no relation on your group, other than it was one of its many topics for gossip. Until of course you decided to take a break to ridicule rape victims. I clearly fall short in character for not finding amusement in ridiculing victims of violent crime. I must seek to improve my character until I become so enlightened. For the record, I have not had a post hidden in 50 days and .14% of my posts have been hidden.
I will keep in mind that in the future if I want to behave properly according to your standards I should instead find a sexist insult to put down all men. Unfortunately, no such word exists in the English language. Perhaps you can suggest one? Shall I instead opt for "batshit," as you refer to women on this site? So I am truly sorry that I suggested you abide by the terms your own group agreed to when I should have followed your own example and hurl insults, and ridicule rape victims, since that is what passes as acceptable behavior for you.
Your obvious hatred of me is no way justifies your continual badgering of Boston Bean and other HOF members (though we do share the collective crime of being born with xx chromosomes) for banning members when you do the exact same thing yourself, not just of me but others too and for reasons no more serious. The only reason you haven't banned more is because so few participate there. Your group's participation: 506 (30 days) 8,582 (year) vs. HOFs, 1,561 and 22,377. That may have to do with the fact HOF discusses actual issues.
Given the venom with which you address me, it is clear there would be no point of requesting to be unbanned. But if you think you can use GD to wag your finger at others without being called out when you have done the same, you are mistaken.
I understand you love nothing more than to lecture others. It is unfortunate, however, that you feel absolutely NO responsibility to abide by the terms for which you condemn others.
Just saying.