Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
29. She'd get her ass sued off if she tried.
Mon May 20, 2013, 02:32 PM
May 2013

Discussions about the newer graphene supercapacitors (which anyone can make with a graphite pencil and an old CD player) have been making the rounds among the science journals and blogs for the past year. Their potential to power everything from cellphones to electric cars have been widely discussed.

She didn't actually create a cellphone charger. She created a graphene supercapacitor and connected an LED to it...something that there are Youtube videos of OTHER experimenters already doing. Beyond that, she (and the media) are simply speculating as to its potential applications. She didn't invent it, and she has merely cited a potential application for it that has ALREADY been cited by others, meaning that it would fail any challenge based on "obviousness".

The technology was actually invented by a guy named Richard Kaner at UCLA, and was initially announced more than a year ago in an article published by the journal Science. I give her props for bringing more attention to the technology, and am impressed that a teenager could pull off a functional implementation of a bleeding edge energy storage device like this, but she didn't actually "invent" anything.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Does she own the rights to it? NCLefty May 2013 #1
She should patent it ASAP and sue hell out of anyone Triana May 2013 #5
She'd get her ass sued off if she tried. Xithras May 2013 #29
Incredible! Whisp May 2013 #2
K&R Sherman A1 May 2013 #3
That's about how long it takes to fill a gas tank in a car Xipe Totec May 2013 #4
I was thinking the same thing MurrayDelph May 2013 #7
and she came in second! d_r May 2013 #6
That is what's amazing NewJeffCT May 2013 #36
Eesha Khare~ sheshe2 May 2013 #8
Man I wish I could come up with some cool invention like that! Initech May 2013 #9
No. MannyGoldstein May 2013 #10
Sounds fishy to me also... Logical May 2013 #12
Not fishy but unlikely to be worthy of front page kristopher May 2013 #17
Killjoy! oldhippie May 2013 #16
Unicorns are real... progressoid May 2013 #20
Hope she got a patent, Exxon Mobil is going to try to get hold of it and lock it up in their safe... W T F May 2013 #11
Why would they care? The phone will eat the same amount/cost of energy regardless. (nt) Posteritatis May 2013 #19
Because it could be scaled up to charge electric cars KamaAina May 2013 #30
Too bad we'll never see it Hugabear May 2013 #13
Yeah, like tires that don't go flat. Been waiting decades for that. nt valerief May 2013 #26
Why? RudynJack May 2013 #31
Cell phone companies selling extra batteries and chargers Hugabear May 2013 #32
Customers would still need chargers. RudynJack May 2013 #34
How long before it's purchased from her and shelved forever? silvershadow May 2013 #14
Before everyone gets too excited jeff47 May 2013 #15
Jeeezzz, another killjoy ..... oldhippie May 2013 #18
I would assume the capacitor would store the charging voltage bhikkhu May 2013 #21
That's what I was thinking as well. n/t Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #22
The article is pretty vague. Obviously capacitors can charge quickly. That's what they do. BlueStreak May 2013 #27
There's also a safety of use issue jmowreader May 2013 #23
thats not much of a breakthrough sodom May 2013 #24
Except that the laws of physics still apply. Heywood J May 2013 #25
replies in this thread crack me up "The Man is going to Stomp Her Down!" snooper2 May 2013 #28
Why are we still getting crappy gas mileage? Hugabear May 2013 #33
tryed to get to the bottom of this story olddots May 2013 #35
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»18-year-old’s breakthroug...»Reply #29