Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Correct me if I am wrong but she is still dead and was killed by pits CBGLuthier May 2013 #1
Yep iwillalwayswonderwhy May 2013 #2
Whoosh. uppityperson May 2013 #23
What? iwillalwayswonderwhy May 2013 #103
Way to pile on the poor bastard Floyd_Gondolli May 2013 #21
Because he allowed his dogs to kill someone. nt ladjf May 2013 #207
The guy who owned the dogs was a drug dealer, who was arrested. baldguy May 2013 #210
I was referring to the dogs owner of course. His occupation is irrelevant to what I would ladjf May 2013 #214
She was killed by a drug dealer. baldguy May 2013 #27
Exactly. The same if the drug dealer had shot her. It would be a people problem, hughee99 May 2013 #60
No, that would be a gun problem ... oldhippie May 2013 #127
really the dogs were drug dealers as well as vicious animals? bowens43 May 2013 #81
Who were owned, trained, abused **AND ALLOWED TO ROAM THE NEIGHBORHOOD** by a drug dealer. baldguy May 2013 #88
IMO a dog attack should be considered to have been inflicted by the owner Orrex May 2013 #92
It differs because... Mr. X May 2013 #170
Well... Orrex May 2013 #179
Like guns ... GeorgeGist May 2013 #3
No they don't Drale May 2013 #56
Guns and pit bulls kill people. kwassa May 2013 #192
Another pitbull post. bunnies May 2013 #4
edit - never mind (nt) Nine May 2013 #6
we can read your edits. plenty are started by those looking to stir shit. PeaceNikki May 2013 #76
Does shit stirring mean replying to a self-deleted post? Nine May 2013 #101
you didn't delete, you edited. PeaceNikki May 2013 #102
This message was self-deleted by its author uppityperson May 2013 #106
You can't reply to a self deleted post. uppityperson May 2013 #108
I personally think 5 threads in 5 days by 1 person on 1 topic is excessive. (nt) Nine May 2013 #120
I personally think re-posting something the jury hid should be bannable. By those measures, you'd be PeaceNikki May 2013 #124
Did they really do that? uppityperson May 2013 #129
Yes, a few times, in fact. PeaceNikki May 2013 #131
DU is such a place. uppityperson May 2013 #133
No I did not. Nine May 2013 #143
If the jury hides your post and you repost it elsewhere, that's poor form. Any idiot can figure that PeaceNikki May 2013 #145
Because ther are a small minority of people on DU who want to eradicate Pit Bulls. baldguy May 2013 #28
Where were you when these breeds went extinct? randome May 2013 #31
I looked at the first few on that list and I wasn't around in the 1800s. uppityperson May 2013 #110
Then how do you address bad owners? randome May 2013 #155
How about a compromise? Shankapotomus May 2013 #38
I don't think those traits were ever intentionally bred *out*. Marr May 2013 #75
Okay, intentionally or not Shankapotomus May 2013 #78
That presupposes these dogs are different from any other dogs. baldguy May 2013 #141
That being your position Shankapotomus May 2013 #175
You're making the same assumption: that Pit Bulls are different. They're not. baldguy May 2013 #177
Why does one dog look any different than another? maxsolomon May 2013 #180
I have no reason to presume Shankapotomus May 2013 #181
No, no, no. Pit bulls do not belong in the wild. They need love and family. cui bono May 2013 #195
Excellent point. And, the truth lies in the trends of deadly dog attacks, right? Buzz Clik May 2013 #5
Well, that settles that. The dogs did no harm, after all. TheCowsCameHome May 2013 #7
I was mugged by an Algerian man. All Algerian men are dangerous. See? uppityperson May 2013 #10
I'd say that dogs have a lot more invested in instinct than people do. Not a good analogy, IMO. randome May 2013 #13
Of course you don't think it is a good analogy. Try:Black people needed to be kept as slaves because uppityperson May 2013 #17
Racist analogies are bad when they're applied to people. baldguy May 2013 #90
Dog breeds were created for specific purposes XemaSab May 2013 #182
And the oldest & **MOST IMPORTANT** purpose all dogs were bred for, starting from 30,000 yrs ago baldguy May 2013 #187
Right Shankapotomus May 2013 #14
Because lions have never been domesticated. Dogs... (ALL dogs) come from domesticated stock. TalkingDog May 2013 #18
Then maybe pitulls should be Shankapotomus May 2013 #24
Oh, yes... that seems to work out very well. Roaming packs of dogs. PeaceNikki May 2013 #42
What do you think wolves are? Shankapotomus May 2013 #46
A dog is not a lion or a submarine. Marriage equality means people will marry their dogs so let's be uppityperson May 2013 #22
So can I have a pet lion? nt Shankapotomus May 2013 #26
Purple. eom uppityperson May 2013 #49
Okay so Shankapotomus May 2013 #73
Personally, I prefer cheesecake over pie. nt uppityperson May 2013 #105
And since there is no way to force people to be more responsible... randome May 2013 #8
You've never heard of licensing & registration? baldguy May 2013 #32
None of that has worked so far, has it? randome May 2013 #37
I could be the most irresponsible dog owner in the world (I'm not, by the way) Bake May 2013 #9
Your venting against people who have the right to their opinion rustydog May 2013 #11
The dog haters "opinion" includes offering "solutions" to a problem which won't solve the problem. baldguy May 2013 #36
Okay. Define 'suffering'. Who will suffer if pit bulls are banned? randome May 2013 #40
Then can I have a pet tiger now? Nt Shankapotomus May 2013 #12
Only if you let it play with Baldguy's pit bulls on Wednesdays! randome May 2013 #16
Your obsession with this topic is pretty strange. Sheldon Cooper May 2013 #15
People can disagree, but passing breed specific legislation is wrong. Like being anti-choice on DU uppityperson May 2013 #20
Yes, you have a point about passing legislation. I understand the concern. Sheldon Cooper May 2013 #25
What is the definitions of "dangerous dog"? uppityperson May 2013 #30
That's your opinion. 99Forever May 2013 #157
Advocating anti-choice legislation is not allowed. Trying to educate people about BSL is right uppityperson May 2013 #161
Oh please. 99Forever May 2013 #166
There are people on this board who want to kill a member of my family. baldguy May 2013 #44
Absolutely no one wants to take your pets away from you. randome May 2013 #50
Yes they do. baldguy May 2013 #85
'Ban', to me, is not the same thing as 'confiscate'. randome May 2013 #99
Then keep it leashed and don't let it roam. TheCowsCameHome May 2013 #84
I don't want anything to do HappyMe May 2013 #87
In the eyes of the law... 99Forever May 2013 #160
Do you make this same comment to all of the threads on the topic with which you agree? PeaceNikki May 2013 #47
Dog haters? HappyMe May 2013 #19
+ 1,000,000 clarice May 2013 #43
This is actually one of my "pet" peeves. clarice May 2013 #29
Where does Jon Stewart fit into your 2 categories? I am curious. uppityperson May 2013 #33
Why ? did he bite someone?. nt clarice May 2013 #39
He owns several. Or were you just talking those who can't handle the dog, in which case it fits uppityperson May 2013 #45
No he owns 3 pit bulls. So now what? Rex May 2013 #52
I think many equate 'ban' with 'confiscation'. randome May 2013 #53
Sure ya do, you hate the breed. Rex May 2013 #59
Way to not address the point I made. randome May 2013 #63
Right keep telling yourself that. Rex May 2013 #66
Me either, I think we are barking up the wrong tree. nt clarice May 2013 #68
Please don't report Randome to the PBDL. Pit Bull Defense league. clarice May 2013 #65
Thank you! randome May 2013 #70
lol. You're welcome. that looks like a vicious cat. nt clarice May 2013 #74
So now you should chill......jeeesh. nt clarice May 2013 #54
All I did was call you out for your asinine post. Rex May 2013 #61
Oh !!! now I get it. Your handle is "Rex". lol. nt clarice May 2013 #69
(with exception of course) nt jmg257 May 2013 #41
Thanks for the back up. Do you ever get the feeling.... clarice May 2013 #57
Why all you did was make an embarrassing post that shows your vast Rex May 2013 #64
That has to be the saddest post I've seen yet about this subject. Rex May 2013 #67
A back window sticker on a pickup truck I saw a couple of weeks ago. randome May 2013 #35
Your "facts" aren't facts at all. baldguy May 2013 #51
offensive to pit bulls ?!!??. nt clarice May 2013 #55
"Gangstas"? "Rednecks"? baldguy May 2013 #93
OMG ! Gimme a break!. too funny. clarice May 2013 #97
I dont think a pack of dachsunds would have created the same situation. boomer55 May 2013 #34
Sounds like you mean size matters. Not breed but size. uppityperson May 2013 #114
There's a subset of "banners", just like there's a subset of "the breed is innocenters" maxsolomon May 2013 #48
The people that want to exterminate the pit bull breed are no better than Rex May 2013 #58
I'd trust a Dalek before a pit-bull hater Drale May 2013 #62
Hmmm...good point. Rex May 2013 #71
A Dalek is only 27% as dangerous as a pit bull. True fact. Orrex May 2013 #86
so the husband saying this make it "the truth" - perhaps someone is a bit too close to this issue DrDan May 2013 #72
how about the ASPCA opinion on BSL? PeaceNikki May 2013 #77
they do - and state that pits are more agressive than other breeds DrDan May 2013 #83
They do not. PeaceNikki May 2013 #91
from the ASPCA DrDan May 2013 #94
You understand that is in context to fighting OTHER DOGS, not people, right? PeaceNikki May 2013 #98
I see - so that aggression is never directed toward people - got it . . . DrDan May 2013 #164
Lots of qualifiers undermine your "are more" statement. uppityperson May 2013 #115
NO ONE was implying pits are ALWAYS more agressive DrDan May 2013 #165
no breed bans Progressive dog May 2013 #79
You know what... wercal May 2013 #80
Shocked that it took this long for someone to post a link to that bullshit site whose data has been PeaceNikki May 2013 #82
Ok...I'll Bite (see what I did there) wercal May 2013 #104
Did you lose your Google CD ROM? PeaceNikki May 2013 #119
So you've got nuthin' wercal May 2013 #125
It's all been posted here on DU... again AD NAUSEUM. I am not your fucking research bitch. PeaceNikki May 2013 #130
So you've got nothing wercal May 2013 #134
Keep telling yourself that, chief. PeaceNikki May 2013 #135
Geez, you act like I made it up or its black magic wercal May 2013 #140
Here you go, go back to the gungeon. PeaceNikki May 2013 #142
You know wercal May 2013 #151
The gungeon is your favorite group, per your profile PeaceNikki May 2013 #159
Ok, these are threads I've found in 'Latest Threads' wercal May 2013 #167
DogBite.org is an anti-Pit Bull propaganda site. Anything from it is full of shit. baldguy May 2013 #96
You dispute their data wercal May 2013 #109
Go to that sites fatatlities stats LostOne4Ever May 2013 #184
Can you link to the dogsbite.org page with the disclaimer you're talking about? Nine May 2013 #188
Here you go LostOne4Ever May 2013 #190
You're claiming that pit bulls "outnumber all the other dogs by 2-100x"? Nine May 2013 #202
OF THE DOGS LISTED LostOne4Ever May 2013 #204
Still not following your math. Nine May 2013 #217
He doesn't understand statistics wercal May 2013 #220
Considering LostOne4Ever May 2013 #224
Color me not impressed wercal May 2013 #225
I guess facts dont impress you at all LostOne4Ever May 2013 #231
Yes I called you emotional wercal May 2013 #234
Here is the math LostOne4Ever May 2013 #222
That's complete gibberish. Nine May 2013 #226
What is gibberish LostOne4Ever May 2013 #228
See post 230 to learn how to do math wercal May 2013 #233
All the math in the world doesn't fix bad initial assumptions wercal May 2013 #230
This misidentification BS makes my blood boil wercal May 2013 #203
Nice story LostOne4Ever May 2013 #206
Where is the 'offense'? Are pit bulls offended? randome May 2013 #211
We are talking about getting rid of a breed of dog that many people love LostOne4Ever May 2013 #216
I don't understand how you can 'love' a breed. I do understand loving a dog. randome May 2013 #223
Wow, fairly dismissive of my 'nice story' about a kid being wercal May 2013 #221
From the CDC Dog Bite Fact Sheet, referencing **YOUR LINK**: baldguy May 2013 #185
And why are they wrong? Why is DogsBite a propaganda website? baldguy May 2013 #189
You should realize that is not real research. Nine May 2013 #200
You're not even reading your own links. baldguy May 2013 #208
you read the links Nine May 2013 #219
Your reading comprehension skills are .... lacking. baldguy May 2013 #232
And here's another study debunking visual breed ID: baldguy May 2013 #191
Ah yes, cross posted. That's the very study I discuss above. (nt) Nine May 2013 #201
No matter which side of the argument you're on, haters gonna hate DainBramaged May 2013 #89
Wow. You're actually using NRA strategies now. aikoaiko May 2013 #95
Hahahaha. Gungeon II. TheCowsCameHome May 2013 #100
a gun is an inanimate object BainsBane May 2013 #107
Yes, imagine the danger if guns were animated. aikoaiko May 2013 #112
Yes, well if the guys who unloaded their BainsBane May 2013 #116
I was just teasing. aikoaiko May 2013 #117
that is true for any dog breed BainsBane May 2013 #118
Species? wercal May 2013 #126
breed BainsBane May 2013 #128
You are starting to babble wercal May 2013 #132
Oh, FFS BainsBane May 2013 #136
Wow - I suppose that's directed at me? wercal May 2013 #146
Yes, you truly are the smartest person on earth BainsBane May 2013 #147
Towering Intellect wercal May 2013 #154
And the two issues collide wercal May 2013 #111
Woohoo. Score a win for gun culture over pit-bull culture. aikoaiko May 2013 #113
We already had a thread on that BainsBane May 2013 #122
pit bulls kill people... ileus May 2013 #186
Yeah well rrneck May 2013 #121
No, they aren't BainsBane May 2013 #123
A large powerful dog regardless of breed rrneck May 2013 #137
You obviously don't know anything about dogs BainsBane May 2013 #138
If you treat any animal with cruelty and aggression rrneck May 2013 #148
It's simply false BainsBane May 2013 #152
I like dogs and with a couple of rare exceptions rrneck May 2013 #158
I have no problem with licensing dogs BainsBane May 2013 #163
No analogy is perfect. rrneck May 2013 #173
no question there is ideological extremism BainsBane May 2013 #174
Y'know, I'll bet rrneck May 2013 #194
We can and should legislate behavior BainsBane May 2013 #196
Can't do it. rrneck May 2013 #197
laws already exist BainsBane May 2013 #199
That's the problem. rrneck May 2013 #213
look at drug laws BainsBane May 2013 #227
The drug wars have been a failure. rrneck May 2013 #229
Another point BainsBane May 2013 #168
Yeah, I heard about that car thing. That sucks. rrneck May 2013 #171
It is true that cities are not islands BainsBane May 2013 #172
Excellent! Finally someone addresses the size of a dog, thank you. I do not know how to enforce your uppityperson May 2013 #139
only it's completely false BainsBane May 2013 #149
Larger dogs can potentially cause more damage more quickly. uppityperson May 2013 #150
Potentially is not probably BainsBane May 2013 #153
how does this validate or invalidate either side of the argument? LanternWaste May 2013 #144
See? See? First it was my guns, now they want my pit bulls. TheCowsCameHome May 2013 #156
more people killed by guns than dogs hollysmom May 2013 #162
Way more BainsBane May 2013 #176
Note to Admins: Turbineguy May 2013 #169
More of this? Wow. n-t Logical May 2013 #178
Since you're on about this again whatchamacallit May 2013 #183
Is your only solution for every problem you face to kill it? baldguy May 2013 #193
I don't buy it whatchamacallit May 2013 #218
um... I really thought you were going to say that the dogs were not pit bulls ecstatic May 2013 #198
Ban the breed. The Link May 2013 #205
Ban the breed banners. baldguy May 2013 #209
We have to ban "assault dogs". krispos42 May 2013 #212
Splendid piece of satire, baldguy! You're giving graham4anything a run for his money. Nimajneb Nilknarf May 2013 #215
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember that woman in ru...»Reply #105