Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The goal was to make wind politically "toxic,"... [View all]Trajan
(19,089 posts)32. What, no CAPS ???
I thought the only way we could talk about toxic wind was with statements that used ALL CAPITOL LETTERS?
Yeah ... some silly ass threads floated by this weekend, and I finally discovered what an absolute @$% that person is ....
I'm guessing that person lived near a wind farm and didn't like seeing the hardware ... why not just directly say "I don't like how it looks" instead of concocting this silly ruse about toxicity? ... I would have greater respect for that ....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Including, even many of them don't realize it, most of our resident climate doomers. n/t
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#62
The same people who claim this malarky will also say climate chage is a hoax.
MindPilot
May 2013
#79
Deducting operating expenses and depreciating equipment and wells is not a subsidy
badtoworse
May 2013
#48
Would it have made a difference if I cited the Energy Information Administration?
badtoworse
May 2013
#93
there are plenty of direct and indirect tax breaks and subsidies for oil & gas; the link i
HiPointDem
May 2013
#96
the link took you to the results of a google search for gas subsidies. the natural gas industry
HiPointDem
May 2013
#98