Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pornography risks should be taught to children as young as five, say parents [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)83. "It's WAY WORSE than what your parents had when they were growing up! It will make you impotent!
It causes date rape! It's addictive!"
wait, sorry, that's the crap drug warriors try to peddle off about pot.
Oh, well, same difference. Just replace "pot" with "porn", and carry on!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pornography risks should be taught to children as young as five, say parents [View all]
alp227
May 2013
OP
How would you educate a 5 year old about pornography without exposing them to pornoraphy?
alphafemale
May 2013
#9
It's hardly the only disturbing thing a young child could find on the Internet.
surrealAmerican
May 2013
#10
All right, I'll ask the obvious question, what exactly are the dangers of pornography?
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#11
It might be harmful, but other than teaching unsubstantiated bullshit, what are these teachers
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#33
It's pointless. Those that give a shit know. Others have their heads firmly planted in the sand
redqueen
May 2013
#28
Just *imagine* if they witnessed a straw man screwing a red herring.... on a slippery slope!
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#81
The problem with answering that question is that you are basically bringing out two scolds
el_bryanto
May 2013
#39
According to the article, this is supposed to be part of a more general sex ed program...
JHB
May 2013
#20
Just say NO kids!!! To this forbidden, mysterious, exciting thing that I can't go into detail about.
tridim
May 2013
#27
No need to be ridiculous. A simple general warning about the internet would work.
redqueen
May 2013
#29
These discussions really make it clear who doesn't talk to their kids about what happens at school.
redqueen
May 2013
#30
The question I would have is whether educating kids on the dangers of porn would do any good.
DanTex
May 2013
#32
Have them read the sites where boys and men discuss not being able to get it up without porn.
redqueen
May 2013
#37
yes, the five year olds who are reading a ridiculous sub-thread on DU. about porn.
PeaceNikki
May 2013
#87
Yes. Gotta make sure kids know early which sex is the subject, and which is the object. nt
redqueen
May 2013
#40
More bullshit people want the schools to teach because some parents are too embarrassed too.
RC
May 2013
#43
First, they need to educate the adults on the differences between pornography
kentauros
May 2013
#48
Just between you and I, I'm not sure Edwin ever had any first-hand experience,
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#97
I'm sure you could survey 1,000 parents and find some to say all manner of goofy shit.
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#59
Sex is an ugly private matter between god sanctioned married adult couples....
Demo_Chris
May 2013
#68
Well, that's better than when the psycho is torturing and killing those who displease him. nt
Demo_Chris
May 2013
#71
"...sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth and you should save it for someone you love."
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2013
#74
"It's WAY WORSE than what your parents had when they were growing up! It will make you impotent!
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#83
That airbrushed playboy centerfold I saw when I was 12 turned me into
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#100