Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Law v Law [View all]

Me.

(35,454 posts)
23. In View Of This Discussion
Mon May 20, 2013, 10:13 PM
May 2013

“WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration’s Justice Department has moved beyond investigating and prosecuting leaks at an unprecedented level to claiming in court documents that committing a standard act of journalism may itself be criminal.
In 2010, FBI agent Reginald Reyes described a reporter, recently identified as Fox News' chief Washington correspondent James Rosen, as possibly being an “aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator” in the leaking of classified information. Reyes made that argument in his request for a warrant for Rosen’s personal email account as part of a leak investigation.
The DOJ’s suggestion that Rosen may be guilty of criminal wrongdoing -- unlike the AP reporters and editors targeted over a May 2012 report about a CIA-thwarted terrorist plot -- is a key difference in the two simmering controversies. The DOJ’s broad use of subpoena power against the AP, revealed last week, has been widely condemned and seen by many as a threat to press freedom and a means to silence sources, including whistleblowers. The DOJ didn't contact the AP before secretly obtaining two months of journalists' phone records, nor did it contact Fox News before getting Rosen's records, a break with the way the government traditionally deals with media outlets.
But the DOJ is now raising further questions about how far the Obama administration will go in rooting out the sources of classified information.”…cont…

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/doj-fox-news-james-rosen_n_3307422.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Law v Law [View all] H2O Man May 2013 OP
help! H2O Man May 2013 #1
Recommended. NYC_SKP May 2013 #2
Your OP has had a remarkable recovery! Luminous Animal May 2013 #22
Like so many issues, we ought not to support the First Amendment only when it serves us. NYC_SKP May 2013 #3
Right. H2O Man May 2013 #10
Kick n/t Yo_Mama May 2013 #4
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT May 2013 #5
I had a H2O Man May 2013 #7
Anytime H2O Man, Anytime... WillyT May 2013 #8
Again, thanks! H2O Man May 2013 #9
k&r Vincardog May 2013 #6
1st Amendment seems to allow for lying, though dickthegrouch May 2013 #11
True. H2O Man May 2013 #14
The biggest problem is one of responsibility, not of laws! mrdmk May 2013 #15
You are right 'the only real win is when the public has all the accurate facts with which to make sabrina 1 May 2013 #27
Yes, I will defend the Devil's rights hootinholler May 2013 #12
Most Excellent Post !!! WillyT May 2013 #18
excellent read G_j May 2013 #13
Very thoughtful and informative thread, premium May 2013 #16
Wonderful. Wonderful OP Me. May 2013 #17
While I agree H2O Man May 2013 #19
There You Go Me. May 2013 #20
My dear Mr Waterman, my heart has been sinking this past week Luminous Animal May 2013 #21
Well, thank you! H2O Man May 2013 #24
I was there for you during your hunger strike and I will be there for you Luminous Animal May 2013 #25
We'll get together H2O Man May 2013 #26
In View Of This Discussion Me. May 2013 #23
Excellent OP, thank you H20 Man! sabrina 1 May 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Law v Law»Reply #23