Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We are absolutely seeing the results of climate change [View all]CreekDog
(46,192 posts)27. You were misrepresenting the OP to make it easier to argue against
and your pattern of posting in this way to undermine those who argue climate change is occurring is absolutely relevant when you do it in this thread.
AverageJoe90 (5,265 posts)
32. I know how you feel.
I've felt the exact same way with certain amongst the climate doomers, and some of the Obama bashers. They are just as fucking irrational as the Gungeoneers, and are about as nasty with you when you disagree with them, so much so that I myself have considered leaving DU on occasion.
But don't give up on us yet, We are a very large community, and people like the gun fanatics, and climate doomers, and Obama bashers, are quite a small minority, and they don't represent most of US, let alone most Democrats(especially the first two, but the third as well). I hope you'll come back sometime.....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2791081
32. I know how you feel.
I've felt the exact same way with certain amongst the climate doomers, and some of the Obama bashers. They are just as fucking irrational as the Gungeoneers, and are about as nasty with you when you disagree with them, so much so that I myself have considered leaving DU on occasion.
But don't give up on us yet, We are a very large community, and people like the gun fanatics, and climate doomers, and Obama bashers, are quite a small minority, and they don't represent most of US, let alone most Democrats(especially the first two, but the third as well). I hope you'll come back sometime.....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2791081
AverageJoe90 (5,265 posts)
57. I personally don't "detest" the doomers for the most part.....
Last edited Mon Feb 11, 2013, 03:31 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
(with the exception of a slight few and one of them's been PPR'd.), it's more of a case of people who just happen to be misguided and gullible enough to believe in every flashy "World Doomed, Humanity At Risk Of Extinction" headline that pops up, regardless of its validity, and that such is inevitable, etc., and who may or may not be forceful in showing off their dogma to others.
http://election.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=98159
57. I personally don't "detest" the doomers for the most part.....
Last edited Mon Feb 11, 2013, 03:31 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
(with the exception of a slight few and one of them's been PPR'd.), it's more of a case of people who just happen to be misguided and gullible enough to believe in every flashy "World Doomed, Humanity At Risk Of Extinction" headline that pops up, regardless of its validity, and that such is inevitable, etc., and who may or may not be forceful in showing off their dogma to others.
http://election.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=98159
AverageJoe90 (5,265 posts)
Riding The Rubicon: The Doomer's Curse. [View all]
Last edited Sat Mar 9, 2013, 12:59 AM USA/ET - Edit history (4)
I've been finding a lot of good stuff on the 'Net lately, and this piece is no exception. Though originally about the BP disaster, it's a piece that can apply to doomsday proponents, wannabe prophets/Cassandras, particularly Climate Change and Peak Oil doomers(but also in general).....and coming from a guy who admits his own tendency to lean in that direction.
Here's the link: http://ridingtherubicon.blogspot.com/2010/06/doomers-curse.html
Probably one of the best pieces I've read in a long time on this subject.
Edit: I apologize for removing the excerpt, but Skinner informed that I'd breached the Forum's copyright rules, because it was too long. I assure you that this was NOT intentional and I have since removed the whole thing, which hopefully, rectified the mistake.
http://election.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2477708
Riding The Rubicon: The Doomer's Curse. [View all]
Last edited Sat Mar 9, 2013, 12:59 AM USA/ET - Edit history (4)
I've been finding a lot of good stuff on the 'Net lately, and this piece is no exception. Though originally about the BP disaster, it's a piece that can apply to doomsday proponents, wannabe prophets/Cassandras, particularly Climate Change and Peak Oil doomers(but also in general).....and coming from a guy who admits his own tendency to lean in that direction.
Here's the link: http://ridingtherubicon.blogspot.com/2010/06/doomers-curse.html
Probably one of the best pieces I've read in a long time on this subject.
Edit: I apologize for removing the excerpt, but Skinner informed that I'd breached the Forum's copyright rules, because it was too long. I assure you that this was NOT intentional and I have since removed the whole thing, which hopefully, rectified the mistake.
http://election.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2477708
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Climate change is a problem....but this particular event does NOT represent any pattern whatsoever.
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#1
The OP didn't say one event was a pattern --but since you're constructing a straw man of her post
CreekDog
May 2013
#4
This had nothing to do with XemaSab. What in the FUCK are you blathering on about, CD?
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#10
You making a straw man of her post and misrepresenting what it said (sometimes called "lying")
CreekDog
May 2013
#11
Where do you think that I was attacking her here?(i.e. where's the proof?)
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#17
i didn't accuse you of stalking, i accused you of serial obfuscation on climate
CreekDog
May 2013
#38
Just about every other post that criticizes "doomster" B.S., that's all. n/t
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#46
Very much more intense, laundry queen.. "How to Understand the Scale of Today's OK Tornado"
Cha
May 2013
#33
2-mile wide tornadoes were possible LONG before this century, Josh, that's the problem.
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#37
That may be true, but we've only had good tornado science since the late '50s, though.
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#66
Josh, the problem is, while these are solid models, they did NOT disprove my original point.
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#93
Well, not so much more extreme weather, really, but rather, more extreme variation in occurrences.
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#13
Yes, we know that 1) climate change is occuring and 2) this event cannot be separated from climate
CreekDog
May 2013
#24
Well, not so much more extremes, as in VARIATIONS of said extremes, in this case, TBH.
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#23
I read this article on NPR today, thought it was too early to post as an OP:
Rhiannon12866
May 2013
#59
But the science is unclear and not settled. There is still room for debate. You must accept my side
Nanjing to Seoul
May 2013
#67
No, I was satirizing the people who will say it's not climate change. The deniers. I completely
Nanjing to Seoul
May 2013
#77
We won't be seeing 25-mile wide tornados, though(5 miles might be a different story, though)
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#85