Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
4. That is true, seemingly
Tue May 21, 2013, 03:06 AM
May 2013

I have seen just two small waterspouts... they came down from the clouds.

Down from the clouds was the visible formation. Something was driving the air down from the clouds.

Downdrafts are a well known and accepted condition in weather formations. What I am proposing is an almost needle like downdraft which is the basis of the tornadoes we see.

Due to the intense nature of the downdraft, an almost vacuum is formed in the cloud which, as you state: "... sucks up all the warm, humid air near the ground up into the storm cloud..."

As this air rises back up to fill in the low pressure in the cloud, it rotates and that is what we see.

This theory is based on the premise of: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

And: What comes down must go up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Alternate theory on Tornado winds [View all] RobertEarl May 2013 OP
Downdraft? More like an updraft Warpy May 2013 #1
That is true, seemingly RobertEarl May 2013 #4
Newtons third law doesn't necessarily mean what it appears you are arguing. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #5
I don't agree RobertEarl May 2013 #9
Wind direction in storms can be incredibly complex and make abrupt changes. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #10
No RobertEarl May 2013 #12
Tornadoes and thunderstorms with cells that gain rotation are usually accompanied by shear forces CreekDog May 2013 #25
Yeah, I don't understand very well the physics involved with tornadoes or thunderstorms. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #26
Definitely an updraft. knitter4democracy May 2013 #18
"The Day After Tomorrow" was a documentary. nt DCKit May 2013 #2
Except not really. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #7
The Day After Tomorrow was a sci-fi film. RebelOne May 2013 #23
Your theory doesn't explain microbursts not creating tornadoes in other parts of the world. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #3
I had considered that RobertEarl May 2013 #6
Microbursts can be very narrow and well structured. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #11
funny you mention Arizona because subsidence there is a result of lifting in equatorial zones CreekDog May 2013 #27
Sounds interesting, at least. n/t AverageJoe90 May 2013 #8
I had thought . . . caseymoz May 2013 #13
As a storm chaser... gadjitfreek May 2013 #14
+1 nt laundry_queen May 2013 #15
+1, thank you for the complete description. caseymoz May 2013 #20
I got started ten years ago... gadjitfreek May 2013 #22
You are a teacher? RobertEarl May 2013 #29
Most importantly, can we blow it up with nuclear bombs? MattBaggins May 2013 #16
IMO, on the ground we need dome shaped roofs with a channel venting system to equalize air pressure CK_John May 2013 #17
Despite popular belief . . . caseymoz May 2013 #21
Try this. BadgerKid May 2013 #19
The 2003 (6/24, Manchester SD) F4 tornado gadjitfreek May 2013 #24
A Theory just us May 2013 #28
Watching the videos it becomes clear RobertEarl May 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alternate theory on Torna...»Reply #4