We are absolutely seeing the results of climate change

[AverageJoe90]

93. Josh, the problem is, while these are solid models, they did NOT disprove my original point.

Yes, while it IS true that more energy is forecast to be in the atmosphere as the globe warms, these models did NOT disprove my original point, which was that this one particular event cannot be necessarily solidly linked with climate change.

When I am wrong I admit it. When I post something misleading (not intentionally), I admit it (say my recollection of something is wrong but has the spirit of the original information).

Josh, this is unfortunately NOT true, in regards between you and I. I won't speak about other situations, but during your arguments with me, you've only RARELY admitted when you're wrong when dealing with this stuff. I, on the other hand, HAVE actually backtracked on the few occasions where it was necessary to do so.

I swear, when you claim to know something or to have some information I don't know about, honest to fuck don't think you fact-check your own words.

I do. And so far, I haven't been wrong more than a few times.

I may not be a genius but internet searches can quickly falsify my own beliefs

And I've had to retract things, too.

In that event you wind up saying stuff that you believe rather than what is true.

That's funny. I could have sworn you had had that exact same issue with me.

Except, I have models, and in that case you have to show how those models are wrong. You don't, ergo you are fucking wrong.

The problem is, again, the models you have, while they are good pieces of research, didn't disprove my point that this particular solitary can't be solidly linked with climate change. Now, of course, climate change could conceivably make events like this one more common(unfortunately), as the models you linked did point out. But my point DOES still stand.