Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Remember that woman in rural LA county who was killed by a pack of dogs last week? [View all]LostOne4Ever
(9,746 posts)206. Nice story
Too bad the source I linked has the dogs checked out by an expert.
And I think that this unscientific and broad generalization of an entire breed is just as offensive, speculative, and non-nonsensical. And AGAIN by the very NUMBERS listed in the link pits are not even in the top three in any category unless you don't take population into account...not to mention breed!
1 in 33k animals does not represent the entire breed. Quit trying to scapegoat the breed.
Hell there are more people dying in car accidents every year by around 3 orders of magnitude. Go try and ban cars with your non-scientific anecdotal stories, leave these poor animals out of your witch hunt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
234 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Remember that woman in rural LA county who was killed by a pack of dogs last week? [View all]
baldguy
May 2013
OP
I was referring to the dogs owner of course. His occupation is irrelevant to what I would
ladjf
May 2013
#214
Exactly. The same if the drug dealer had shot her. It would be a people problem,
hughee99
May 2013
#60
Who were owned, trained, abused **AND ALLOWED TO ROAM THE NEIGHBORHOOD** by a drug dealer.
baldguy
May 2013
#88
I personally think re-posting something the jury hid should be bannable. By those measures, you'd be
PeaceNikki
May 2013
#124
If the jury hides your post and you repost it elsewhere, that's poor form. Any idiot can figure that
PeaceNikki
May 2013
#145
Because ther are a small minority of people on DU who want to eradicate Pit Bulls.
baldguy
May 2013
#28
Excellent point. And, the truth lies in the trends of deadly dog attacks, right?
Buzz Clik
May 2013
#5
I'd say that dogs have a lot more invested in instinct than people do. Not a good analogy, IMO.
randome
May 2013
#13
Of course you don't think it is a good analogy. Try:Black people needed to be kept as slaves because
uppityperson
May 2013
#17
And the oldest & **MOST IMPORTANT** purpose all dogs were bred for, starting from 30,000 yrs ago
baldguy
May 2013
#187
Because lions have never been domesticated. Dogs... (ALL dogs) come from domesticated stock.
TalkingDog
May 2013
#18
A dog is not a lion or a submarine. Marriage equality means people will marry their dogs so let's be
uppityperson
May 2013
#22
The dog haters "opinion" includes offering "solutions" to a problem which won't solve the problem.
baldguy
May 2013
#36
People can disagree, but passing breed specific legislation is wrong. Like being anti-choice on DU
uppityperson
May 2013
#20
Yes, you have a point about passing legislation. I understand the concern.
Sheldon Cooper
May 2013
#25
Advocating anti-choice legislation is not allowed. Trying to educate people about BSL is right
uppityperson
May 2013
#161
Do you make this same comment to all of the threads on the topic with which you agree?
PeaceNikki
May 2013
#47
He owns several. Or were you just talking those who can't handle the dog, in which case it fits
uppityperson
May 2013
#45
There's a subset of "banners", just like there's a subset of "the breed is innocenters"
maxsolomon
May 2013
#48
so the husband saying this make it "the truth" - perhaps someone is a bit too close to this issue
DrDan
May 2013
#72
You understand that is in context to fighting OTHER DOGS, not people, right?
PeaceNikki
May 2013
#98
Shocked that it took this long for someone to post a link to that bullshit site whose data has been
PeaceNikki
May 2013
#82
It's all been posted here on DU... again AD NAUSEUM. I am not your fucking research bitch.
PeaceNikki
May 2013
#130
DogBite.org is an anti-Pit Bull propaganda site. Anything from it is full of shit.
baldguy
May 2013
#96
Excellent! Finally someone addresses the size of a dog, thank you. I do not know how to enforce your
uppityperson
May 2013
#139
um... I really thought you were going to say that the dogs were not pit bulls
ecstatic
May 2013
#198
Splendid piece of satire, baldguy! You're giving graham4anything a run for his money.
Nimajneb Nilknarf
May 2013
#215
