Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
10. Whoa....I rarely disagree with you, but really?
Tue May 21, 2013, 11:24 AM
May 2013

"Because no one foresaw something like this."

Those of us opposed to nuclear have foreseen potential for meltdown disaster since, oh, about day 1. And recognized that, regardless of the odds against a single, major disaster, it really only takes one single major disaster to fuck up a significant chunk of the world for a really, really long time.

Or did you mean that no proponents, or designers or builders foresaw potential for meltdown? Or potential, in this case, for earthquake *and* tidal wave hitting a nuke plant built next to a major fault line in an area where earthquakes tend to generate tidal waves? It's really too bad it took having it happen for them to have the imagination to consider that possibility.

That said, I'm really glad some people have changed their minds about nuclear and decided it really is too risky...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bad enough and of long enough duration to pollute the Pacific Ocean. The world's nations should byeya May 2013 #1
Agree marions ghost May 2013 #2
This: It's a world disaster. CrispyQ May 2013 #6
But this "cost" is not included in the cost of generating nuclear power electricity. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #3
It IS cheaper but this is the first time something of this magnitude and duration has occurred. randome May 2013 #5
Whoa....I rarely disagree with you, but really? magical thyme May 2013 #10
The second one. randome May 2013 #13
"This has gone on for far too long." magical thyme May 2013 #15
yes and it's time to fucking crater it. n/t nebenaube May 2013 #23
"No one foresaw"????????????? ARE YOU KIDDING HERE?? WinkyDink May 2013 #12
Not this type of disaster. At least not that I ever heard of. randome May 2013 #20
Yet there is those who would like to see more of these built madokie May 2013 #4
me too! flamingdem May 2013 #7
I'll do whatever it takes madokie May 2013 #9
In this case it's a problem that Japan is such a staunch ally flamingdem May 2013 #8
Save the Japanese economy; doom the Japanese people, the Pacific Ocean, island nations, ...... WinkyDink May 2013 #14
A contaminated Pacific will be the new normal. It's ok. Don't worry. Safetykitten May 2013 #11
"Your people are driven by a terrible sense of deficiency. Zorra May 2013 #16
I'm heaven05 May 2013 #17
Should I request the owners for a name change to Cassandra? nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #18
The collective will of the planet 90-percent May 2013 #19
It's funny how people will eat fish contaminated with mercury... hunter May 2013 #21
Talking about what? nebenaube May 2013 #24
They are talking about removing everything but the tritium from the stored water. hunter May 2013 #25
Steady stream of radiation pouring JEB May 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Japan Times: Discharges o...»Reply #10