Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(37,305 posts)

7. I read the shield law wouldn't apply to "national security".

Tue May 21, 2013, 12:41 PM

May 2013

Boy like that isn't something they use all the time.

What do you think about reporters being called "co-conspirators"? Scary stuff.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Not sure what that's supposed to mean. LuckyTheDog May 2013 #2

You know what is hysterical about this? nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #4

Who said blogs are not 'media'? LuckyTheDog May 2013 #6

A lot of our residents decrying nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #8

That's what I was asking LuckyTheDog May 2013 #5

FISA, is, in your opinion, contrary to the 4th Amendment LuckyTheDog May 2013 #10

My suggestion ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2013 #12

I read the shield law wouldn't apply to "national security". dkf May 2013 #7

A media shield law would bring in judicial oversight LuckyTheDog May 2013 #11