Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
86. This is a much larger story than people realize. On August 2nd Romney lost the election on this
Tue May 21, 2013, 12:50 PM
May 2013

one issue.

Romney came out against the subsidy.

That was the end of the election for all practical purposes.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014183554#post16

I don't live in a rural area but I have relatives who do and one is an attorney. One of the most recent little constant jobs he gets is helping the farmers get the maximum rate for putting in a wind turbine. They don't make a lot but even an additional $ 1000 a month is a big deal for a farmer that has to go through times when there is no cash coming in waiting for harvest or waiting for the season to start.

The most stunning point of the campaign was when the Republican Nominee came out against wind subsidy. Do they not understand anything about their rural base?

At that point there was no possibility of a Romney win, he had to turn some states red and Iowa was a must turn.

Problem is that Iowa leads the country in wind turbines on farm land:









http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/smart-energy-solutions/increase-renewables/farming-the-wind-wind-power.html

Working with Wind Developers
One of the easiest and most attractive ways for farmers to benefit from wind power is to allow developers to install large wind turbines on their land. The royalties are typically around $2,000 to $5,000 per year for each turbine, depending on its size. These payments can provide a stable supplement to a farmer's income, helping to counteract swings in commodity prices.



So when the Republicans come out against the wind subsidy they are giving the state to the Democrats. Obama won Iowa by 90,000 votes, approximately the number of farmers and their families that are directly related to the wind subsidy in Iowa.

Moreover their explanation is absurdly cynical.



Their main argument: Wind is too costly and should compete on a "level playing field" rather than survive on "handouts."



To that I have a single word answer:

Ethanol

Don't think that the people of Iowa saw right thru that one?

I know that they have lost touch with their rural base, but for god sake don't they know how to use google?
k&r n/t RainDog May 2013 #1
And some gulible folks here carry water for the Koch brothers. FSogol May 2013 #2
Not gulible, they are looking to make a quick buck. Rex May 2013 #52
Including, even many of them don't realize it, most of our resident climate doomers. n/t AverageJoe90 May 2013 #62
Easy to spot. Just look for the 401k label. nt raouldukelives May 2013 #83
What I find interesting is... jberryhill May 2013 #3
Same here. If GE wants to do the right thing, more power (heh) to them. n/t FSogol May 2013 #4
Yes this doesn't bother me either. alarimer May 2013 #58
When I break wind, it's usually toxic. Apophis May 2013 #5
So the "nuanced" opinions actually came from the RW Koch bros? DevonRex May 2013 #6
Shocking nooz, eh?...nt SidDithers May 2013 #7
Seriously, this could knock the earth off its orbit. BlueStreak May 2013 #8
.oh.my.dog. Whisp May 2013 #41
The same people who claim this malarky will also say climate chage is a hoax. MindPilot May 2013 #79
You should read Duncan Birch's new book BlueStreak May 2013 #82
lol NT ctsnowman May 2013 #91
Living in coal country, with the highest cancer rates in the nation... Pragdem May 2013 #9
+1 LisaLynne May 2013 #42
Or solar power for that matter? AverageJoe90 May 2013 #63
K&R nt abelenkpe May 2013 #10
Not at all surprised siligut May 2013 #11
I blame his "hair" zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #15
True, wind is certainly the nemesis of Trump's do siligut May 2013 #16
Indeed zappaman May 2013 #17
Looks like a dying tribble. Rex May 2013 #54
His "hair" Lordquinton May 2013 #23
when it comes to the Donald zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #33
go where? "his hair?" Lordquinton May 2013 #36
ah, I read it as refering zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #37
Great post! Matariki May 2013 #12
K&R octoberlib May 2013 #13
Flashing Blades Of Subsonic DEATH!!! Ikonoklast May 2013 #14
At some point, wind needs to compete without tax credits badtoworse May 2013 #18
why? oil still isn't 'weaned off' tax breaks. HiPointDem May 2013 #22
Agreed. HappyMe May 2013 #26
We don't generate electricity with oil, it's a transportation fuel. badtoworse May 2013 #27
With natural gas Kolesar May 2013 #30
Funny. I've got an oil burning power plant right by my house in Florida. Fuddnik May 2013 #84
yes we do. & even if we didn't, so what? HiPointDem May 2013 #40
It's true we burn a small amount of distillate oil in peakers... badtoworse May 2013 #45
... HiPointDem May 2013 #46
Deducting operating expenses and depreciating equipment and wells is not a subsidy badtoworse May 2013 #48
Do you actually know anything about subsidies? kristopher May 2013 #55
Let's agree on what is and is not a subsidy badtoworse May 2013 #80
IER? Seriously? No wonder you express rightwing views... kristopher May 2013 #92
Would it have made a difference if I cited the Energy Information Administration? badtoworse May 2013 #93
IOW you don't believe climate change is real. kristopher May 2013 #99
I guess we'll have to disagree. badtoworse May 2013 #100
we must not be reading the same links. HiPointDem May 2013 #66
There are two sides to every story. Try these badtoworse May 2013 #71
there are plenty of direct and indirect tax breaks and subsidies for oil & gas; the link i HiPointDem May 2013 #96
The link just took me to Google badtoworse May 2013 #97
the link took you to the results of a google search for gas subsidies. the natural gas industry HiPointDem May 2013 #98
or ethanol grantcart May 2013 #88
Why? EC May 2013 #31
What tax credits do gas, nuclear or coal fired plants get? badtoworse May 2013 #44
Are you kidding?.. n/t EC May 2013 #47
No badtoworse May 2013 #49
Do your own research EC May 2013 #51
See Post 48 badtoworse May 2013 #53
Again, do some research EC May 2013 #57
When we generate 20% of our electricity from wind jpak May 2013 #65
Not going to happen, but you can dream about it. badtoworse May 2013 #81
That sounds like a capitalist idea! More important to gtar100 May 2013 #102
There are plenty of capitalists in the wind industry already badtoworse May 2013 #104
Toxic wind only when it blows coal fumes nt Progressive dog May 2013 #19
Or "Agent Orange" LondonReign2 May 2013 #20
Someone tell the Dukes, uh, I mean the Kochs, about Wind Fracking. kentauros May 2013 #21
Warning to Republicans and some crooked Democrats Jack Rabbit May 2013 #24
Be careful Sid, you'll get a double Iggy. GoneOffShore May 2013 #25
FEAR THE WIND CANCER!!!!!!!!!1111!1one backscatter712 May 2013 #28
And oil isn't surviving on "handouts".. n/t EC May 2013 #29
What, no CAPS ??? Trajan May 2013 #32
Damn, you're right... SidDithers May 2013 #34
A level playing field might require Oil companies to give up Ilsa May 2013 #35
Someone was sending me emails and website links that claimed windmills were... Triana May 2013 #38
Yeah, it's really weird. LisaLynne May 2013 #43
Sing it Triana..... MAD Dave May 2013 #59
Hundreds of years of windmills in Netherlands and East Coast of England. HooptieWagon May 2013 #60
Its a fact that windmills are making people crazy. grantcart May 2013 #89
+1 Triana May 2013 #94
The FF industry isn't the only source. kristopher May 2013 #39
Wow, who knew this plot would take this kind of twist? Rex May 2013 #50
Looks like somebody's got some 'splaining to do. Codeine May 2013 #56
They just don't care. Fuck 'em all. AverageJoe90 May 2013 #61
This is what repugs have done since the 1980's jpak May 2013 #64
and China MindPilot May 2013 #74
K&R! sheshe2 May 2013 #67
My, my....nt msanthrope May 2013 #68
From now on, jurors should hide any post pintobean May 2013 #69
I'd say that maybe GD Hosts would lock those threads... SidDithers May 2013 #70
You've documented the "shtick" very well....nt msanthrope May 2013 #72
Bad luck hide in that insufferable thread...nt SidDithers May 2013 #76
Every once and a while you gotta take one. 'Insufferable' is a good word. msanthrope May 2013 #78
Least County Times, BREAKING: WINDFARMS CAUSE TORNADOS MindPilot May 2013 #73
Nailed the schtick perfectly... SidDithers May 2013 #75
I'd respond, but your on my iggity list. MindPilot May 2013 #77
So, if wind needs to compete on a level playing field NewJeffCT May 2013 #85
This is a much larger story than people realize. On August 2nd Romney lost the election on this grantcart May 2013 #86
Good post... SidDithers May 2013 #87
This post should be an OP. FSogol May 2013 #95
The Koch criminals - how did I guess? Initech May 2013 #90
yup..... madrchsod May 2013 #101
K&R nt Zorra May 2013 #103
K & R Scurrilous May 2013 #105
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The goal was to make wind...»Reply #86