Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Magistrate

(96,043 posts)
32. Again, Sir: Scratch A Gun Fetishist, Find A Criminal
Tue May 21, 2013, 05:54 PM
May 2013

The whole 'law-abiding gun owner' line is in the same class as 'jumbo shrimp': the demands of their fantasy life as heroic slayers of 'thugs' and resistors to 'tyranny' require them to adopt an attitude of 'bending the rules' and 'defying authorities' in the pinch when the gun is in hand. So their actual attitude to the law is not 'I will obey the law' but rather 'I will decide which laws I will obey', and yet still their own conviction they are righteous and law-abiding people allows them to feel they are not criminally inclined when they harbor the intent to break laws at will, and even that they are not criminals when they actually break laws.

The attitude of a locale's populace towards a law does not mean a fig to the duty of a law enforcement official regarding his sworn duty to uphold and enforce the law. Nor, for that matter, does his own attitude towards a particular law. If these people are announcing they will not enforce a state law, a law it is their sworn duty to uphold, they are not fit to hold their office, and if some mechanism for removing them exists, it should be exercised to remove them, as they clearly are not willing to abide by the laws of the state.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If He Has The Authority To Remove Them, Sir, He Certainly Should The Magistrate May 2013 #1
And the congregation said: AMEN! Sekhmets Daughter May 2013 #3
What if the people that elected these sheriffs agree with them? hack89 May 2013 #16
Sheriffs enforce the law, and should quit sucking up to NRA types for contributions and perks. Hoyt May 2013 #29
What perks would that be Hoyt? nt. premium May 2013 #31
That would be dinners, trips, prostitutes, maybe guns, etc. Hoyt May 2013 #33
Then you know jack shit about Sheriffs. premium May 2013 #40
They are politicians, always looking for a "contribution" or favors. Hoyt May 2013 #41
And you know this how? premium May 2013 #42
You ever been involved in county politics? Appears not. Hoyt May 2013 #43
You ever give a straight answer? Appears not. premium May 2013 #44
I gave a straight answer. You don't seem to have experience to get it. Hoyt May 2013 #46
A straight answer? premium May 2013 #47
Again, Sir: Scratch A Gun Fetishist, Find A Criminal The Magistrate May 2013 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 May 2013 #35
Then when state elections come around again... Chan790 May 2013 #45
Sheriffs have to enforce the law - that I agree. hack89 May 2013 #48
How are they scofflaws? premium May 2013 #18
In NY, county Sheriffs are elected officials. The Governor can't remove them. baldguy May 2013 #25
If The Article Is Correct, Sir, There Is A Constitutional Provision Allowing For Removal The Magistrate May 2013 #34
Apparently he can mwrguy May 2013 #38
Sorry, Cuomo is dead wrong. Daemonaquila May 2013 #2
yup, the arbitrator should be the ballot box, its why there are different levels of government loli phabay May 2013 #4
Yup, you're correct. However, longship May 2013 #6
yup there is not enough info, not sure what the sheriffs should do in all honesty loli phabay May 2013 #7
I think that you've hit the crux of the matter, and the solution. longship May 2013 #15
Nowhere in the article does it say that they're not enforcing the new laws, premium May 2013 #19
I have no problem with that. longship May 2013 #23
I wonder if NY is the only state that a Gov. premium May 2013 #27
I dunno. The article leaves it open... longship May 2013 #30
On the other hand... longship May 2013 #5
thing is theres a lot of discretion allowed for leos in applying laws loli phabay May 2013 #8
I imagine the meeting was all about enforcement. longship May 2013 #10
Cuomo is correct to insist on enforcement. Telling them not to voice an opinion? Not so much. Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #17
But many on DU are two-sided on this principle. NutmegYankee May 2013 #22
Yup, it's a sticky wicket, all righty. longship May 2013 #26
There is also the issue of illegal aliens Daninmo May 2013 #36
Well said. longship May 2013 #37
Yes there is. Slippery slope. nt Mojorabbit May 2013 #13
No kidding! Travelman May 2013 #20
Way to go Cuomo, premium May 2013 #9
The same voters who... longship May 2013 #11
You mean the law that was passed so quickly premium May 2013 #14
Huh? longship May 2013 #21
My apologies, premium May 2013 #24
No problemo! longship May 2013 #28
Sort of what those in Michigan have the say about the single un-elected individual Bandit May 2013 #12
K and R for all the gun fanciers Kingofalldems May 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cuomo tells gun-loving sh...»Reply #32