Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jobless claims drop to almost a four-year low [View all]karynnj
(60,978 posts)10. Your arithematic is right, your equation is wrong
The two numbers are from different sources. The 200,000 is an estimate of the NET change in jobs - ie the jobs gained - the jobs lost. It is not correct to subtract the new claims from that number.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not just the "teabag/freeper set". As Bill Press said last night, there are some who claim to be...
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2012
#14
This is FIRST TIME unemployment claims for a week. But then you have to consider people who FOUND
RBInMaine
Feb 2012
#50