Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
108. We don't ignore where the breed originated
Wed May 22, 2013, 03:19 AM
May 2013

We just point out that it's largely irrelevant to any given individual of that breed. It's a question of training and owner responsibility.

If anyone's ignoring breed histories, I'm afraid it's the advocates of breed bans. Find me a dog breed that doesn't have at least some roots in maiming other living things. Please.

The #1 most popular dog in America, the Labrador retriever is a descendant of ship mastiffs - dogs bred and trained to tear up anyone not part of he crew who came aboard. It's got gundog ancestry as well, which is where the "retriever" part comes from. Newfoundlands show the mastiff ancestry even more clearly.

The #2, Yorkshire terrier, was like most terriers bred to, well, grab other animals and shake them around until limbs fly off. In the yorkie's case, this was rats. it was also used as a pit dog against smaller "game" - rats, other small dogs, cats, whatever might bring in the money.

They also do this, which is cool, I guess.

#3, the German shepherd is one of the classic "tough" dogs; originally derived to kill the shit out of wolves and other dogs who came near its flocks, then put in top tier for police and military uses. Most dog attacks in the world probably come at the teeth of a german shepherd; but so long as someone in a uniform holds the leash, it's not added to statistics.

#4, golden retriever, large spaniel and probably the other half of the labrador's ancestry. Alright, seems this guy was only used to pick up critters that were already dead, and do so carefully.

#5, beagle, scent hound. Bred to chase foxes in large packs. Fox hunts usually ended up with the hounds ripping the animal to shreds. This was apparently "jolly good sport," or something. Probably right up there with a terrier in how much carnage they can cause to your furniture, and the amount of terror they inflict on neighborhood cats, squirrels, and whatever else.

#6, dachshund, another scent hound. Like the beagle. only with badgers. In my experience, one of the most consistently foul-tempered breeds ever. Them and the goddamned cocker spaniels.

#7, boxer, mastiff type. descended from the german "bullenbaiser" which, if my three years of High school German doesn't fail me, means "bull-baiter." Originally used as a savage-game hunter (bears, boars, that sort of thing), then brought into the fighting ring, then trained as military attack dogs. Nowadays most famous for being tough-looking cuddlywumpuses who are more likely to run away from a huffy kitten than bark at it.

#8, poodle, gun dog. If assholes who wanted to have a "tough" dog knew anything, we'd be hearing about poodle attacks and pit bulls would be counsidered frou-frou. Don't let their silly show bouffants fool you, a standard poodle is a big, strong, ill-tempered animal who should not be trusted with anything that might at any point be considered as tasting somewhat like a pork chop. The breed history doesn't point towards any particular meanness.. .but then you remember, they're french, and the idea of a foul-tempered dog with a bad haircut that is still inexplicably popular with women makes sense
(I kid, I love poodles, but seriously, they're fluffy dingos, keep your eye on 'em)

#9, shih-tzu, a non-working dog of "ancient" type. Specially bred to look oriental because, well, Victorians did stupid shit like that. Probably descended in great part from the Lhasa apso and Pekingese, two breeds that were so dangerous, so evil and maniacal, that the Ancient chinese had to breed deformities like squished heads and rickety shoulder gircles into them just ot keep them under countrol (this is joking, save that the two breeds are known to be rather agressive to strangers. Most shih tzus I've happened across were perfectly nice and not at all like a Lhasa apso nightmare-dog)

#10, Miniature Schnauzer, herding type (they look like terriers, but yup, they're more related to german shepherds). While not exactly agressive, they are hugely intelligent, which leads to a situation where thye can become the alpha animal in the houseghold if the human isn't prepared. They are also very protective and, given the high rate of training failure, this can lead to the animal becoming snappy, prone to aggression displays, and otherwise being an unworkable asshole of a dog.

If the AKC recognized the APBT, it would very likely come in at #3, and yes, its background is a breed bred to chew up other dogs in a fighting ring. So are several other breeds, from boston terriers, to pugs, to the shar pei. It's my feeling that it's this lack of recognition that leads to at least some of the problem; there's no real oversight of the breeding practices, the breed is not normalized via dog shows and the like, and as the OP shows, any dog can look vaguely like a pit bull and thus every dog that attacks can get called a pit bull by someone.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't know... one_voice May 2013 #1
I hate dogs. Kill them all and let God sort it out. Buzz Clik May 2013 #2
that looks like aboxer to me, they like to hit people and othr dogs in play, hollysmom May 2013 #4
I'd start with the 'humans'. Look what the hell that we have done with this 'place'... eom Purveyor May 2013 #27
I found the Pitbull: reformist2 May 2013 #3
I'll guess 54 but have no clue. A couple I don't think so, but narrowed down to 4. uppityperson May 2013 #5
As I understand it, the best way to determine the pitbull... Buzz Clik May 2013 #6
I think it's dog 58. Just a guess. I'm no expert... n/t truth2power May 2013 #7
That is my guess too. Control-Z May 2013 #31
That's mean! Xithras May 2013 #8
So sick of the damn pit bull posts. n-t Logical May 2013 #9
It's a mission. defacto7 May 2013 #106
#54 krispos42 May 2013 #10
No fair! You didn't dress the pit bull crosses right for a where's the pit cross challenge... pinboy3niner May 2013 #11
You need to get something to help you relax rustydog May 2013 #12
You obviously haven't considered the pit bulls assisting with breast-feeding in Olive Gardens pinboy3niner May 2013 #16
The claim remains pure horseshit. n/t Chan790 May 2013 #17
It's a trick question anyway... defacto7 May 2013 #107
Oh, dog 79 looks a lot like the doggie my daughter adopted from the pound! Lone_Star_Dem May 2013 #13
Has to be 111 because it's so unlikely NV Whino May 2013 #14
No. DevonRex May 2013 #21
Good post. When "pit bull" attacks are reported, more often than not Luminous Animal May 2013 #15
I think this is a trick question! Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #18
My son has one like #8 OriginalGeek May 2013 #19
My first choice was DevonRex May 2013 #20
None of the above. eom rdharma May 2013 #22
Wrong again. n/t Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #59
This is the correct answer. eShirl May 2013 #113
58 looks like it has... one_voice May 2013 #23
Dogs rule Zo Zig May 2013 #24
FIND THE PIT BULL!! answers. baldguy May 2013 #25
But I got it right! rdharma May 2013 #28
"Bred to latch on, take down and kill." flvegan May 2013 #29
No. I didn't. rdharma May 2013 #33
Oh goody, a live one. flvegan May 2013 #39
You got it doubly wrong. baldguy May 2013 #30
Riiiiiight! If your family enjoys dog fighting! rdharma May 2013 #35
You saying all families with a pit bull enjoy dog fighting? flvegan May 2013 #40
No, not all. rdharma May 2013 #46
Re-read your post. flvegan May 2013 #53
In modern times Mr. X May 2013 #100
Then all game dogs should be banned. baldguy May 2013 #103
It differs Mr. X May 2013 #121
We don't ignore where the breed originated Scootaloo May 2013 #108
I am owned by one of those vicious German Shepherds FloridaJudy May 2013 #124
One of the most aggressive dogs I've walked was an intact male Puggle. smokey nj May 2013 #130
No dog is suited for an irresponsible owner Scootaloo May 2013 #109
Very interesting breakdown of mixes, thank you. I ruled out the basset, never guessed chow and sprin uppityperson May 2013 #36
wow. excellent. Thanks. robinlynne May 2013 #81
What was the breed identification methodology? XemaSab May 2013 #99
As simple as it says: "We conducted a national survey of dog experts..." baldguy May 2013 #101
Did they use the blood test or the saliva test? XemaSab May 2013 #102
Both can be used to test DNA. Why should it matter? baldguy May 2013 #105
The saliva test is unreliable XemaSab May 2013 #110
"The saliva test is unreliable". On what basis do you make that claim? baldguy May 2013 #116
Try this one on: XemaSab May 2013 #125
So, your objection to the DNA testing is based on a CYA disclaimer on a retailers web store? baldguy May 2013 #136
"an average accuracy of 84% in first-generation crossbred dogs of known parentage" XemaSab May 2013 #146
Um...you do understand that 84% is higher than 43%? baldguy May 2013 #147
Right. You got nothing. baldguy May 2013 #150
I'm apparently as bad at this as everyone else Scootaloo May 2013 #104
Wow! GoCubsGo May 2013 #123
Aren't the American Staffordshire Terrier and the American Pit Bull Terrier two different types, blueamy66 May 2013 #129
25% of a particular breed is considered "predominant". baldguy May 2013 #134
But, the AmStaff isn't a pit bull, correct? blueamy66 May 2013 #135
. baldguy May 2013 #138
Whatever blueamy66 May 2013 #140
DU has been talking about this for 2 weeks, & there are literally a million web sites on the subject baldguy May 2013 #141
Okay blueamy66 May 2013 #142
An hour is up, I'm going to bed. TheCowsCameHome May 2013 #26
I bet he's going to tell us they all have pitbull in them. Baitball Blogger May 2013 #32
Hey baldguy, oddly enough flvegan May 2013 #34
Yeah, funny that. baldguy May 2013 #37
This works just the same as you trying to figure out what an assault weapon is. CokeMachine May 2013 #54
. baldguy May 2013 #70
No "Pit Bulls" shown........... rdharma May 2013 #38
You again? flvegan May 2013 #41
Look at post #22 rdharma May 2013 #49
Being wrong is easy. Occulus May 2013 #139
No, there isn't! rdharma May 2013 #143
The last one shown above. Dog #111. Occulus May 2013 #145
Oh, brother! rdharma May 2013 #148
Not odd at all. They are typical Americans, living in terror of the extremely unlikely Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #57
Hm. Good post. flvegan May 2013 #85
Put them in a room with somebody and see which one mauls the person to death Orrex May 2013 #42
^^^ Doesn't know shit about dogs. n/t flvegan May 2013 #43
^^^Posts as though he knows a great deal more than he does. n/t Orrex May 2013 #45
^^^ Clueless, and should prove up his claim or shut up. n/t flvegan May 2013 #48
^^^Doesn't know what "n/t" means Orrex May 2013 #50
^^^ Has nothing to add, proves my point in reference to clueless. n/t flvegan May 2013 #52
^^^Thinks PETA is a serious organization but calls me clueless Orrex May 2013 #56
^^^ Can't argue his way out of a wet paper bag. n/t flvegan May 2013 #60
^^^Takes the bait every single time but thinks I'm clueless Orrex May 2013 #62
^^^ STILL can't properly argue a point. Is laughable at best. n/t flvegan May 2013 #66
^^^Hook, line & sinker every single time Orrex May 2013 #68
^^^ Reaffirmation of cluelessness. Address what you said, please. n/t flvegan May 2013 #71
^^^How do you keep a pit bull apologist in suspense? Orrex May 2013 #73
Post removed Post removed May 2013 #77
^^^How do you keep a pit bull apologist in suspense? Orrex May 2013 #78
^^^ I just happend on this thread... pinboy3niner May 2013 #82
Hold my beer and watch this ^<^><^>^<^>^<>^<^ TheCowsCameHome May 2013 #114
I think the poster has proven that they're clueless. baldguy May 2013 #51
Not the first time on this topic, sadly. flvegan May 2013 #55
How about this definition: ozone_man May 2013 #153
Anything with four legs & a tail, huh? baldguy May 2013 #47
Lmao!!! darkangel218 May 2013 #84
Oh crap! I have pit bull! Gormy Cuss May 2013 #87
. LWolf May 2013 #115
DUzy! Not this post but the whole slap fight following. nolabear May 2013 #83
Dog 58. n/t RebelOne May 2013 #44
No pit bulls above......... rdharma May 2013 #58
Again, you? flvegan May 2013 #61
Again....... I got the "trick question" correct! rdharma May 2013 #65
See post #64. No need to tell you twice. n/t flvegan May 2013 #72
Hate to tell you, but posting stupid twice doesn't make it any less stupid. baldguy May 2013 #64
baldguy with the bigtime win! LOL!!!! flvegan May 2013 #67
So why are you posting multiple times trying to defend your OP? rdharma May 2013 #69
Because it's defenseless, like those poor, sweet, cuddly pit bulls Orrex May 2013 #75
If you've seen one pit bull, you've seen a maul Orrex May 2013 #63
^^^^ unblock May 2013 #126
Your logic makes no sense. Courtesy Flush May 2013 #74
Can you spell FLAMEBAIT? nm rhett o rick May 2013 #76
There are 24 dogs that are part American Staffordshire Terrier or Staffordshire Bull Terrier baldguy May 2013 #80
I didn't incorrectly identify! rdharma May 2013 #89
Three times. baldguy May 2013 #90
Three times correct! rdharma May 2013 #92
58 89 111 Politicalboi May 2013 #79
Instead... deathrind May 2013 #86
Pit Bulls don't harm people with any greater frequency than other dogs do. baldguy May 2013 #88
Show me the data. deathrind May 2013 #91
What happened with the "Find the Pit Bull" game? rdharma May 2013 #93
It's been done. baldguy May 2013 #94
No! Don't need guard dogs. rdharma May 2013 #95
You are the one... deathrind May 2013 #97
You're the one saying they are more dangerous. baldguy May 2013 #98
Look at the numbers. deathrind May 2013 #117
The Clifton Report? Is this a joke? baldguy May 2013 #122
Curse you! Ohio Joe May 2013 #96
pit bull defenders are no different than the gun fetishists bowens43 May 2013 #111
You finally drove me over the edge. I would never say this under ordinary circumstances. randome May 2013 #112
if a dog shows a propensity for agression (breed) or actual agression, destroy it galileoreloaded May 2013 #118
GD has really gone to the dogs. marmar May 2013 #119
It's the pits, man. randome May 2013 #120
that's bull, dawg! unblock May 2013 #127
I think it is safe to say that baldguy is putting on the dog, at the very least. Nimajneb Nilknarf May 2013 #132
I don't know what a pit bull looks like, but Dog 89 looks like the curr that micturated on my boots. Nimajneb Nilknarf May 2013 #128
#54. Jazzgirl May 2013 #131
Wikipedia's BSL page whatchamacallit May 2013 #133
I don't have a dog in this fight (mine's a Sheltie), but 1. that's a Wikipedia page ScreamingMeemie May 2013 #152
Found it. NCTraveler May 2013 #137
K&R DainBramaged May 2013 #144
8 & 58?? LiberalElite May 2013 #149
solution Trajan May 2013 #151
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All you ... PEOPLE who su...»Reply #108