Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. The WSJ
Wed May 22, 2013, 10:34 AM
May 2013
Employers are increasingly recognizing they may be able to avoid certain penalties under the federal health law by offering very limited plans that can lack key benefits such as hospital coverage.

...is full of shit. Employers must provide the essential health benefits or pay a fine. They can chose not to provide the coverage, but they will be subjected to a fine. How on earth are people getting duped by this article? The law did not reduce existing coverage. In fact, the minimum package is better than the existing requirement.

HHS releases draft rules on key elements of Obamacare, including pre-existing conditions

by Joan McCarter

Yes, President Obama won reelection and the Affordable Care Act is the law of the land. On Tuesday, the Department of Health and Human Services released proposed regulations on some of the key elements of health insurance reform in the law, including how insurers can vary premiums based on age, tobacco use, family size and geography, proposed rules for essential health benefits, and rules governing employer-based wellness programs. These are the draft rules, with comment period open for the next month.

For the majority of the uninsured, the key rules are the market reforms, the rules that prevent insurers from denying coverage because of pre-existing conditions, and that set the limits on how insurers can vary premiums, limiting the variation to age (within a 3:1 ratio for adults), tobacco use (within a 1.5:1 ratio and subject to wellness programs in group insurance), family size and geography. That means that insurers can no longer charge exorbitant premiums as individuals age, or for smokers. Nor can they charge higher premiums because you have lady parts. Also prohibited is charging more based on occupation, past health problems, or employer size or industry. What's more, insurers will be prohibited from refusing to renew coverage because an individual or employee becomes sick or has a pre-existing condition.

The essential health benefits rules establish 10 categories in which services must be included in health plans: ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services (including behavioral health treatment), prescription drugs, rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices, laboratory services, preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management, and pediatric services, including oral and vision care. Health plans offered in the individual and small group markets, including both those in the exchanges and in the existing market, have to offer a core package of items and services in those categories.

The third set of rules provides the requirements for employer wellness programs. These programs have to be "reasonably designed to promote health or prevent disease," meaning that they can't set unreasonable or unobtainable goals and rewards to employees. They have to establish alternative health standards that can be met by all people, including those "whose medical conditions make it unreasonably difficult, or for whom it is medically inadvisable, to meet the specified health-related standard."

This is the stuff health insurance reform was all about, the core regulations that will make health insurance affordable and accessible. They're also the parts of reform that will be most popular and important to the public. This is the stuff Republicans absolutely did not want to see implemented, and the stuff that will make "Obamacare" be as much an appreciated part of the nation's health care system as Medicare.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/20/1163479/-HHS-releases-draft-rules-on-key-elements-of-Obamacare-including-pre-existing-nbsp-conditions

Hobby Lobby Must Cover Contraception For Employees, Judge Rules
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/11/19/1219011/hobby-lobby-judge/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021858364


New Federal Rule Requires Insurers to Offer Mental Health Coverage

By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration issued a final rule on Wednesday defining “essential health benefits” that must be offered by most health insurance plans next year, and it said that 32 million people would gain access to coverage of mental health care as a result.

The federal rule requires insurers to cover treatment of mental illnesses, behavioral disorders, drug addiction and alcohol abuse, and other conditions.

Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, said that in addition to the millions who would gain access to mental health care, 30 million people who already have some mental health coverage will see improvements in benefits.

White House officials described the rule as a major expansion of coverage. In the past, they said, nearly 20 percent of people buying insurance on their own did not have coverage for mental health services, and nearly one-third had no coverage for treatment of substance abuse.

- more -

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/21/health/new-federal-rule-requires-insurers-to-offer-mental-health-coverage.html

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022407451

The WSJ has been working to undermine the law since it was passed.

Wrong on Obamacare, WSJ editorial board searches for new spin
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022846359

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ACA: clusterfuck. KG May 2013 #1
Unless a few states can use its provisions to establish local single payer eridani May 2013 #2
It's praised by many still Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #11
ACA will enable me to retire early without worrying about "medical coverage" Kolesar May 2013 #35
Your opinion about how good that insurance will be is worth about what your opinion-- eridani May 2013 #45
Why? eom Kolesar May 2013 #46
I take it you have a plan of action ready for when your claims get turned down? eridani May 2013 #48
Nah, I'm still going to quit my job and spend my time on DU blogging with these exciting people Kolesar May 2013 #49
"If after internal appeal the plan still denies your request for payment or services, you can ask-- eridani May 2013 #53
This part is scary: Ilsa May 2013 #3
who could have predicted? Enrique May 2013 #5
Oh my, this is so true! How could we have possibly forseen this? It's mystifying! Safetykitten May 2013 #17
Oh brother. City Lights May 2013 #47
"Administration officials confirmed in interviews that the skinny plans, in concept . . . " DrDan May 2013 #4
Still better than what the employees have now.. Bandit May 2013 #6
but they will be uninsured Enrique May 2013 #7
They are uninsured right now Bandit May 2013 #13
No one goes bankrupt over a doctor's office bill. They go Ilsa May 2013 #21
And for want of a copay for an office visit, many don't go to the doctor either. So there you have Safetykitten May 2013 #28
Yes, the insurance needs to be comprehensive Ilsa May 2013 #36
Most of these employers will probably go for the high deductible aka "Consumer Driven" plans dflprincess May 2013 #41
How? An insurance policy that doesn't pay for the insured is just extortion. n/t Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #9
It is extortion if they make employees pay the bill Bandit May 2013 #14
you are making the incorrect assumption that employees of these large corporations are uninsured DrDan May 2013 #16
Legally required. You wrote the problem of this whole train wreck in your reply. Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #20
huh? how is that? DrDan May 2013 #15
Uh, in case you forgot 800,000 about work for WALMART. Safetykitten May 2013 #22
uh . . . and many many more work for IBM, AT&T, GM, etc etc etc DrDan May 2013 #31
We should call them Baucus policies, in "honor" of Max's great service to Zorra May 2013 #8
Perhaps our elected representatives.... Flyboy_451 May 2013 #10
The WSJ ProSense May 2013 #12
And like clockwork... Safetykitten May 2013 #18
Here: ProSense May 2013 #23
Sure, using people as time buyers for what should of been is quite classy. Safetykitten May 2013 #24
Is that supposed to be a sentence? eom Kolesar May 2013 #38
What if paying the fine is cheaper than going along with the plan? nt clarice May 2013 #34
Yes, the WSJ is full of shit. Moosepoop May 2013 #37
Don't Be So Sure..... ill wind May 2013 #42
Welcome to DU my friend! hrmjustin May 2013 #44
Well, let's see...nation's largest employer is Walmart, and...oh, nevermind. Safetykitten May 2013 #19
Wow. That basically amounts to NO coverage. WinkyDink May 2013 #25
Yes, this fact is lost on many. Safetykitten May 2013 #26
thats why my employer just cut our coverage to bare bones, $2500 out of pocket before they pick up Demonaut May 2013 #27
seriously. use the er for service, buy pet store antibiotics. crash the system. its gonna happen galileoreloaded May 2013 #29
Well this will upset the worshippers. n/t L0oniX May 2013 #30
This is just the tasty party snacks part, The full course nightmare is being heated up as we speak. Safetykitten May 2013 #32
HAHA Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #43
Dude, you're on the wrong thread! Kolesar May 2013 #50
Obamacare: Tastes great! Less filling. Or, Obama DOESN'T really care. MotherPetrie May 2013 #33
K&R woo me with science May 2013 #39
kick woo me with science May 2013 #40
Time for single payer and to eliminate ties with the job on point May 2013 #51
and you won't be eligible for subsidies from the exchange because you will have "affordable" antigop May 2013 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Employers Eye Bare-Bones ...»Reply #12