Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why use a printer to take duckweed and shape it into a leg of lamb? Buzz Clik May 2013 #1
aahh the replicator warrior1 May 2013 #2
That did cross my mind when I read this. n/t cynatnite May 2013 #3
While I thought of C-H-O-N food, kentauros May 2013 #10
But will the Monsanto chemicals be there newfie11 May 2013 #4
Does someone think that a multi-thousand dollar machine Bay Boy May 2013 #5
And who could possibly believe this expensive machine will be used to make food for poor Nay May 2013 #17
I believe Contractor is looking toward the future siligut May 2013 #20
And when those "tons of food" start disappearing and the price starts going up SomethingFishy May 2013 #24
Out of thin air? No. Out of Carbohydrates and proteins.. SomethingFishy May 2013 #23
Or, maybe, stop destroying the land? (nt) scarletwoman May 2013 #36
Maybe they could concoct some Soylent Green? gordianot May 2013 #6
Not very energy efficient. We already have devices for kestrel91316 May 2013 #7
Livestock is a chore is space. Bluenorthwest May 2013 #11
Lol newfie11 May 2013 #12
I hope they go light on the carbs. nt naaman fletcher May 2013 #8
Sure, just insert this $30,000 food cartridge and you can print 100 loaves of bread! denverbill May 2013 #9
can we lace the food with a sterilizing agent? galileoreloaded May 2013 #13
tea, earl gray, hot n/t yodermon May 2013 #14
You'll get a substance that's almost, but not quite entirely, unlike tea. n/t backscatter712 May 2013 #25
/thread... SidDithers May 2013 #28
We'll make this planet uninhabitable long before we hit 12 billion. kestrel91316 May 2013 #15
Yes, that too. Let's stop asking this question: "How can we feed 12 (14, 18, 200) billion people" Nay May 2013 #18
Who is "we"? Warren DeMontague May 2013 #27
I didn't know you could eat plastic ... Bake May 2013 #16
Call me an outlier, but I prefer the soylent blue. lumberjack_jeff May 2013 #19
Wow. Reminded of Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age Matariki May 2013 #21
Lots of kneejerk responses to this technology Orrex May 2013 #22
And this is surprising why? Warren DeMontague May 2013 #26
I can think of a brazilian reasons it might work, but first, can you tell madinmaryland May 2013 #32
To quote Lewis Black: Initech May 2013 #29
I'll have two slices with extra protein layer, please KamaAina May 2013 #30
Hate to be a Debbie Downer and all that... derby378 May 2013 #31
Yep. The war for water is going to kill us all before that. cliffordu May 2013 #33
End world hunger? In a word... nnnnnnnnope. cherokeeprogressive May 2013 #34
Would you eat that shit? I sure wouldn't eat that shit. scarletwoman May 2013 #35
I suppose it would depend on how hungry you were... cynatnite May 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NASA awards grant for 3-D...»Reply #8