General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dogs are not people, does anyone else find it weird how some seem to equate the two? [View all]truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Any one person can only do so much. And I have already taken a number of creatures--all special and all unique--into my care. So in this case, if I can help the creatures in my charge I will do that, before considering what other hypothetical creatures might need. There are always more...and to me each is exceptional, and individual, and special. But I can't save them all.
That's me. In 2008 I paid $5000 (ouch) for a splenectomy for my 8-yr-old 90 lb German Shepherd/Doberman/something else? cross Charlie. He lived, and flourished, and as a senior statesman is still with us today. I would do it again--thank Dog I've never had to--but it was within my power and he needed it.
Sorry, but your response above seems predicated on rationing out a fixed amount of benefit to the largest possible number of dogs. It sounds OK in theory but seems heartless in practice.