Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The assassination of 16 y/o American citizen Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. That's part of what she shouted [View all]rug
(82,333 posts)44. "involved (in) jihadi activity" is not the standard enunciated today.
From the AP:
Ahead of the address, Obama signed new "presidential policy guidelines" aimed at illustrating more clearly to Congress and the public the standards the U.S. applies before carrying out drone attacks. Officials said the guidelines include not using strikes when the targeted people can be captured, either by the U.S. or a foreign government, relying on drones only when the target poses an "imminent" threat and establishing a preference for giving the military control of the drone program.
Neither is "close proximity".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
153 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The assassination of 16 y/o American citizen Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. That's part of what she shouted [View all]
Poll_Blind
May 2013
OP
I hope you will demonstrate your bona fides for this statement by demonstrating how you are not
patrice
May 2013
#28
None of the details about the son or his upbringing are in any way relevant.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2013
#4
He was A Combatant, Sir: A Young One, And Not the Target, But A Participant
The Magistrate
May 2013
#6
So you may claim, but you have no evidence to provide to prove your claim, other than proximity.
MNBrewer
May 2013
#10
You're right. I did not provide an argument, I provided a conclusion: "a mistake, a bad mistake."
rug
May 2013
#59
Well, Sir, I Have To Go Cook, And Clearly You Are Not Up To the Demands Of Actually Arguing A Point
The Magistrate
May 2013
#62
That's everyone's wish. The only disagreement is to the degree that it is possible and still
stevenleser
May 2013
#39
I get where you're coming from, Steve, but often hesitation is a better course than regret.
rug
May 2013
#46
Report of brussels group says more civilians are killed by drones than terrorists.
HiPointDem
May 2013
#94
Since It Is Obvious You Understand The Ludicrous Stretching You Are Engaged In, Sir
The Magistrate
May 2013
#21
I dont disagree with much about what you say but I would argue that with regards to collateral
stevenleser
May 2013
#8
That's always an option for all involved. I encourage you to pursue it equally with all parties.
stevenleser
May 2013
#25
There is something wrong with the idea that no one should try to hurt each other?
stevenleser
May 2013
#29
It's wrong because there are situations in which not trying to hurt someone is morally wrong.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2013
#35
There are other options you and others seem to keep overlooking though to.
cstanleytech
May 2013
#128
As I said in the third paragraph of the post you're replying to, no. N.T.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2013
#152
I think it was his 'family' in the USA that first said he was at a BBQ, the reports I read said...
Tx4obama
May 2013
#37
My USC spouse spent ten years of childhood in Germany. Does that make it more ok to kill my spouse?
leveymg
May 2013
#78
Exactly. I'm hoping we find what I call a post-drone solution to the Al-Qaeda and affiliate problem
stevenleser
May 2013
#5
Actually ignored, no, I had no problem with Bush going after actual terrorists either. nt
stevenleser
May 2013
#127
I object not to the existence, but rather to the content of the opinions you express
MNBrewer
May 2013
#23
Consider the paternalistic assumptions about the rest of us that you make in such statements. wow.nt
patrice
May 2013
#42
The argument is that an American is entitled to the bill of rights and a non-American is not
stevenleser
May 2013
#9
yeah? Still puzzled about what happened to the chechen friend of Tamerlan Tsarnaev
librechik
May 2013
#30
Please, for the sake of your own case against this, could everyone opposed to these kinds of actions
patrice
May 2013
#40
taking your son to high level al-quaeda meetings should raise some ethical questions too
arely staircase
May 2013
#54
k, so if I can't get an answer to #40, I am forced to conclude that the killing IS OKAY as long as
patrice
May 2013
#60
I thought it was interesting what a frenzy could be caused simply by relaying what...
Poll_Blind
May 2013
#83
people who dissed Bush all those years are all of a sudden concerned about "respecting the
boilerbabe
May 2013
#88
"..the only reason these folks didn't like bush is because he wasn't a democrat."
Scurrilous
May 2013
#150
Wow, all the way fucked up "Kid had it coming cuz he was likely to become a terrorist" apologias
whatchamacallit
May 2013
#87
1 and 2 don't contradict each other. There are plenty of combatants we don't target (nt)
Recursion
May 2013
#136
Posts saying he was accidentally hit belong in the Creative Speculation forum. nt
Bonobo
May 2013
#91
Any standard that would require that would put posts saying he was targeted there, too. n/t
Bolo Boffin
May 2013
#96
It's amazing how "does not pass the smell test" always manages to confirm one's own bias. n/t
Bolo Boffin
May 2013
#99
Until I have a reason to discount what the Obama administration has said...
Bolo Boffin
May 2013
#120
The rationalizations on this thread for execution without trial, execution of bystanders, execution
HiPointDem
May 2013
#95
Sometimes I have to check I didn't accidentally wander into Free Republic n/t
whatchamacallit
May 2013
#97
i don't see how your comments follow from anything i said. i nevertheless doubt your conclusion.
HiPointDem
May 2013
#104
A hypothetical. If we could have killed OBL to prevent 9/11, but in doing so perhaps kill
still_one
May 2013
#107
If capture and prosecution is not an option, then bombing is the least-bad alternative.
jeff47
May 2013
#112
I think most would say Yes because of the lives it would save, and this is really what
still_one
May 2013
#116
Yes same thing with Hitler the week before he gave the orders to load up the trains
graham4anything
May 2013
#131
where are these 'terrorist' attacks on 'us' taking place? because the only war *i'm* seeing
HiPointDem
May 2013
#117
i repeat, where are these terrorist attacks in this 'war' against 'us' taking place? because the
HiPointDem
May 2013
#119