Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 03:47 PM Feb 2012

Bank Bailout 2: Obama Lets Mortgage Abusers Off the Hook Leave No One Accountable [View all]

Bank Bailout 2: Obama Lets Mortgage Abusers Off the Hook
The Obama Administration has followed a predictable pattern: Leave No One Accountable
By Common Dreams staff
February 9, 2012


After months of talks with state and federal officials, the banks have reportedly agreed to help some homeowners reduce their mortgage debt or refinance their homes at lower rates. Over 4 million familes lost their homes to foreclosure yet just 750,000 people who lost their homes to foreclosure will receive a one-time check for just $1,800 to $2,000, which for many will barely cover the cost of moving. The deal will only help a fraction of the struggling homeowners affected by the bank’s practices.

New York and California have reportedly signed off on the deal after initially holding it up in protest of lenient treatment of the banks.

The deal gives banks immunity from civil lawsuits for "robosigning," a practice whereby homeowners were rapidly evicted without proper vetting.

In his January 24th State of the Union address, President Obama promised a fresh investigation into mortgage abuses that led to the financial meltdown. Now, before that investigation has even begun, Obama is granting these 5 "too big to fail" banks immunity from "robo-signing" abuses.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/02/09-5


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Top Twelve Reasons Why You Should Hate the Mortgage Settlement
By Yves Smith
February 9, 2012


1. We’ve now set a price for forgeries and fabricating documents. It’s $2000 per loan. This is a rounding error compared to the chain of title problem these systematic practices were designed to circumvent. The cost is also trivial in comparison to the average loan, which is roughly $180k, so the settlement represents about 1% of loan balances. It is less than the price of the title insurance that banks failed to get when they transferred the loans to the trust. It is a fraction of the cost of the legal expenses when foreclosures are challenged. It’s a great deal for the banks because no one is at any of the servicers going to jail for forgery and the banks have set the upper bound of the cost of riding roughshod over 300 years of real estate law.

2. That $26 billion is actually $5 billion of bank money and the rest is your money. The mortgage principal writedowns are guaranteed to come almost entirely from securitized loans, which means from investors, which in turn means taxpayers via Fannie and Freddie, pension funds, insurers, and 401 (k)s. Refis of performing loans also reduce income to those very same investors.

3. That $5 billion divided among the big banks wouldn’t even represent a significant quarterly hit. Freddie and Fannie putbacks to the major banks have been running at that level each quarter.

4. That $20 billion actually makes bank second liens sounder, so this deal is a stealth bailout that strengthens bank balance sheets at the expense of the broader public.

Read the other 8 reasons and full article at:

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/02/the-top-twelve-reasons-why-you-should-hate-the-mortgage-settlement.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Obama’s Guiding Principle: Leave No One Accountable
By: Scarecrow
February 9, 2012


The Obama Administration has followed a predictable pattern we now recognize. It has consistently functioned like criminal defense counsel, whose mission is to get their criminal clients, the major corporations and executives who fund their elections, off with no admission of guilt, no forced resignations, and as little harm to their reputation, or that of the counsel, as possible. To do this, they neutralize anyone with an ounce of public purpose in their veins.

Its role is then to convince the public that whatever you thought or feared was going on in America, and whoever you believed had caused the collapse of America’s economy, caused millions to lose their jobs, their homes and their retirements and continued to loot the country, it’s time to look forward. Because everyone who matters — and that’s not you — now agrees, they say, to function in the public interest, even though it’s a bald face lie, since nothing has changed and the looters and their complicit overseers are still in charge.

Obama’s people have performed this function for America’s looters over and over again. They did it for Wall Street, the banks, the rich tax evaders, the insurance companies, the oil companies, the gas companies, the coal companies, the CIA, the DoD, and numerous torturers and their legal/policy enablers and associated war criminals in the previous administration.

Consistent with this strategy, Obama’s team must silence, neutralize or punish anyone who protests or blows the whistle on the massive criminality and corruption involved. It must also emasculate the left and what’s left of the liberal wing of the Dem Party, using the argument that the Administration is not nearly as awful as the other Party’s people, who openly glorify looting and killing and vilifying the victims.

Read the full article at:

http://my.firedoglake.com/scarecrow/2012/02/09/obamas-guiding-principle-leave-no-one-accountable/


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Bank Bailout Day, February 9, 2012
By emptywheel
February 9, 2012


Forty-nine states, every one but Oklahoma, as well as federal regulators, will participate in a foreclosure fraud settlement that will release the five biggest banks (Wells Fargo, Citi, Ally/GMAC, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America) and their mortgage servicing units from liability for robo-signing and other forms of servicer abuse, in exchange for $25 billion in funding for legal aid, refinancing, short sales, restitution for wrongful foreclosures and principal reduction for underwater borrowers. The announcement will be made on Thursday.

And then there’s the settlement price: $25 billion, divided up several ways. $3 billion will go toward refinancing for current borrowers who are underwater on their loans, as well as short sales. $5 billion will go as a hard cash penalty to the states, which can use them for legal aid services, foreclosure mitigation programs, and ongoing fraud investigations in other areas (one official close to the talks feared that much of that hard cash payout will go in some Republican states toward filling their budget holes). The federal government will get a cash penalty as well. Out of that $5 billion, up to 750,000 borrowers wrongfully foreclosed upon will get a $1,800-$2,000 check if they sign up for it, the equivalent of saying to them “sorry we stole your home, here’s two months rent.”

If you read DDay’s full post (or if you’ve read anything here), it’s clear that the amount of fraud was astronomical: 60% failures in one case. And if you’ve read that far, you know this is a bail out, every much as the billions gifted to banks in September 2008 was a bailout.

The Administration wants to call this a settlement.

http://www.emptywheel.net/2012/02/09/bank-bailout-day-february-9-2012/


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The banks have won, homeowners are re-victimized.
By: Cynthia Kouril
February 9, 2012


The NY Times is reporting that NY and California have agreed to sign on the 50 state deal and that is will immunize robo signing. If that is true, it’s over folks. The housing market is not going to recover any time soon and the court system will be permanently corrupted by forged and perjurious documents.

This settlement is an incredible breach of the social contract between the government and the governed.

On top of everything else, nobody seems to think it’s going to be helpful to the recovery of the housing market, help the economy, or do anything except bail out the banks, again. From the Times:

“I wouldn’t say it’s a panacea for the housing industry but it is good for the banks to get this behind them,” said Jason Goldberg, an analyst with Barclays.


Read the full article at:

http://my.firedoglake.com/cindykouril/2012/02/09/the-banks-have-won-homeowners-are-re-victimized/



106 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fantastic post, thank you! MrCoffee Feb 2012 #1
But I have a cat and she can't read! Better Believe It Feb 2012 #4
Ddu rec. Nt xchrom Feb 2012 #2
He's making it extremely difficult to.... SammyWinstonJack Feb 2012 #3
Stay asleep & oblivious? Kaleko Feb 2012 #5
Well, I'm glad someone likes this "arangement". bvar22 Feb 2012 #6
Business as.... Dragonfli Feb 2012 #85
Why do you want the Republicans to win? izquierdista Feb 2012 #7
Was any actual law broken by the banks or is this just one of those things that are frowned upon? FarLeftFist Feb 2012 #8
This is about abuses chowder66 Feb 2012 #9
Almost bringing down the entire world economy into a new depression might be considered an "abuse". Better Believe It Feb 2012 #14
So true! Rex Feb 2012 #49
I'm responding to you because chowder66 Feb 2012 #66
We're good! It was just a misunderstanding on my part Better Believe It Feb 2012 #73
Will anyone either on the right or the left ever give President Obama credit for doing anything? nanabugg Feb 2012 #53
Everything possible? How is this joke settlement "everything possible"? MrCoffee Feb 2012 #54
Hi nanabugg chowder66 Feb 2012 #67
I heard over and over on this board that the settlement would not let them off the hook Mojorabbit Feb 2012 #80
No, they only have to pay about $2,000 For each foreclosure fraud and homeowners can not sue. Dragonfli Feb 2012 #86
they are being accused of fraud Enrique Feb 2012 #10
nah... see, this article came out, and now people pretend to not know fascisthunter Feb 2012 #59
You're asking four different questions there MrCoffee Feb 2012 #11
Excellent post MrCoffee nt PufPuf23 Feb 2012 #21
Thanks for clearing that up. Obviously this is: FarLeftFist Feb 2012 #39
Both of those are absolutely true MrCoffee Feb 2012 #42
I would love to see a few jury trials in places like Detroit Mojorabbit Feb 2012 #81
The Robo signing was a crime. Just this past week, finally, at last, sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #20
Civil courts can't "land people in jail." They've been given only civil immunity on robo-signing. Robb Feb 2012 #22
It's not clear in the article, that the immunity from charges re robo-signing sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #40
Unless I am mistaken jsmirman Feb 2012 #63
I know they are not off the table for most of the criminal activities, but sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #68
It was actual fraud. fasttense Feb 2012 #89
This will continue until we get the money out of politics. woo me with science Feb 2012 #12
And we seem to be going in the opposite direction on that issue also. There is sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #46
Occupy is THE ONLY way fascisthunter Feb 2012 #60
What did you expect? hifiguy Feb 2012 #13
We may have to hold more than our nose. Better Believe It Feb 2012 #16
I disagree, apparently. Robb Feb 2012 #15
This was the lawsuit. It's now a done deal. Not a very good one. Better Believe It Feb 2012 #18
No, this was a single settlement. Come on now. Robb Feb 2012 #19
So post information on all of the other lawsuits that are being litigated. They must be big ones! Better Believe It Feb 2012 #50
well done! fascisthunter Feb 2012 #61
That's some misplaced smugness, considering one of them is already mentioned in this thread. Robb Feb 2012 #69
And there are so many things wrong with that one issue it's hard to keep track of them all MrCoffee Feb 2012 #23
These five banks are forking over $26-39 billion. To settle one issue. Robb Feb 2012 #27
They are absolutely NOT forking over anywhere near that MrCoffee Feb 2012 #28
Those five banks are setting aside reserves. Robb Feb 2012 #33
The expected cost does not include the write-down/refi MrCoffee Feb 2012 #35
Really? So in your mind, Obama is giving hell to the big bankers? DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #29
And "immunity against civil suits on robosigning" is equally nothing. Robb Feb 2012 #32
Please post credible links on the "real fight ahead"lawsuit. Better Believe It Feb 2012 #51
You have an opportunity to self-delete this post and save face. Robb Feb 2012 #70
So that's the really big ground braking lawsuit we need to watch and should ignore this settlement? Better Believe It Feb 2012 #74
Very dishonest, not at all what I said. You said "this was the lawsuit. It's now a done deal." Robb Feb 2012 #75
OK Let's see your links to the other 49 lawsuits that matter. Better Believe It Feb 2012 #91
You're going to have to kick your own propaganda today. Robb Feb 2012 #94
Organized corporate crime pays in the USA. PufPuf23 Feb 2012 #17
Well said. nt woo me with science Feb 2012 #99
I think I'll check the analysis from other sources. MineralMan Feb 2012 #24
The blue link bank is already being built MrCoffee Feb 2012 #25
Well said. n/t FSogol Feb 2012 #30
BBI didn't analyze anything. Links were posted. You have no space to talk about unreliability DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #31
He or she chose the articles to post. I find those sources to be unreliable. MineralMan Feb 2012 #34
Several glaring self-contradictions stand out Kaleko Feb 2012 #62
Read my posts on DU. MineralMan Feb 2012 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #78
Those sources are extremely popular progressive sources and always have sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #79
Popular does not always equal accurate. MineralMan Feb 2012 #93
Well, all of that can certainly be said of most or what makes up our current sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #97
you got thrown out of FR DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #100
Yes, I was banned there after I left. MineralMan Feb 2012 #101
Reads like a personal attack. nt Romulox Feb 2012 #36
It's not. It's an attack on the sources. MineralMan Feb 2012 #37
Another distortion of what you actually wrote - plain to see for everyone. Kaleko Feb 2012 #52
Please enjoy yourself. You'll find plenty of my posts to examine. MineralMan Feb 2012 #65
Let's see now.. Kaleko Feb 2012 #72
Right, these sources are just not up to your meticulous standards. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #58
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2012 #26
Now we don't just micromanage the President, we micromanage federal prosecutors treestar Feb 2012 #38
Your argument is "We can't possibly hope to understand this, so it must be good"? MrCoffee Feb 2012 #41
The argument is even worse than that brentspeak Feb 2012 #43
The willful ignorance is staggering MrCoffee Feb 2012 #44
And to use that willful ignorance as a club Kaleko Feb 2012 #82
For all those who were wrongfully foreclosed on and lost their homes, sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #84
k&r jannyk Feb 2012 #45
Quoting from a blog now?? Major Hogwash Feb 2012 #47
Still laughing? MrCoffee Feb 2012 #48
+1 xiamiam Feb 2012 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author Better Believe It Feb 2012 #56
MSNBC: Mortgage settlement leaves most homeowners to fend for themselves Better Believe It Feb 2012 #57
More Hope And Cave... WillyT Feb 2012 #71
And here I am trying to start my life over from the collapse in the housing mmonk Feb 2012 #76
Kick woo me with science Feb 2012 #77
Banksters Win Again, Regular Folks Lose As Usual colsohlibgal Feb 2012 #83
The talking point is: Don't worry there are a lot more lawsuits pending! Better Believe It Feb 2012 #92
k&r Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #87
Wow. Thank you for posting this. Rec #45 inna Feb 2012 #88
So. Did Schneiderman sell out? Or, as he said last night on annabanana Feb 2012 #90
Good news for the victims of mortgage fraud and BBI hates it. tridim Feb 2012 #95
Right. Wall Street has lost and the people who have been thrown out of their homes have won! Better Believe It Feb 2012 #102
I'm a victim of mortgage fraud, and I'm happy with the settlement. tridim Feb 2012 #103
I understand your economic desperation. But you would be far better off with a settlement that's . Better Believe It Feb 2012 #106
k&r Cameron27 Feb 2012 #96
Kick woo me with science Feb 2012 #98
What the settlement really says: mfcorey1 Feb 2012 #104
AG Settlement Ends Robo-Signing and Provides a Model for Preventing Foreclosures Swede Feb 2012 #105
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bank Bailout 2: Obama Let...