General Discussion

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)

43. You formed this OP out of no information at all, so I guess anything goes.

Reply to patrice (Reply #41)

Thu May 23, 2013, 08:46 PM

May 2013

Does that answer your evasion?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

101 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Medea Benjamin is a hypocrite helping Rand Paul protect WORLD ASSAULT WEAPONS MARKETS [View all] patrice May 2013 OP

Can You Point Me, Ma'am, To Her Endorsement Of His Opposition To This Treaty? The Magistrate May 2013 #1

You'd think she would want to make that distinction clear. She hasn't. She has the spotlight now, patrice May 2013 #2

Yet You, Ma'am, Have Not Made Yourself Clear The Magistrate May 2013 #3

Do you think that her endorsement on the drone issue, without this specific exception, does not patrice May 2013 #7

Not Particularly, Ma'am The Magistrate May 2013 #8

Isn't it the responsibility of one seeking such a huge spotlight to make such far reaching claims patrice May 2013 #13

That Is A Pretty Far Stretch, Ma'am The Magistrate May 2013 #16

Not "every point of disagreement", but, YES, certainly, the most germane. & patrice May 2013 #28

I Have No Objection To The Drone Program, Ma'am The Magistrate May 2013 #30

Do we agree that any political support for Rand Paul, intentionally or not, supports his agenda? ... patrice May 2013 #4

That's another very silly claim. I can think about few people who's endorsement will cost RP a lot idwiyo May 2013 #46

if patrice refuses, maybe the 3 people (so far) who recommended this mystery thread boilerbabe May 2013 #6

Don't hold you breath. This is flamebait, nothing else. idwiyo May 2013 #18

So, you're saying wide open assault weapons markets all over Earth have nothing to do with drones?nt patrice May 2013 #21

I am saying that you are making up shit as you go. :) idwiyo May 2013 #27

Totally agree! nt City Lights May 2013 #63

Agreed....... FarPoint May 2013 #29

Can you please provide some factual support to your claim? The link you have provided has nothing idwiyo May 2013 #5

That's the same thing as saying all decisions about political support are based upon 100% knowledge patrice May 2013 #9

So, you have no proof, meaning you made it up. In which case your post is a pure flamebait. idwiyo May 2013 #17

Please address my point: Her endorsement has a positive effect on RP's whole agenda, because most patrice May 2013 #19

I already did: your post is a flamebait. If you insist it is not you must provide evidence to idwiyo May 2013 #25

I doubt that even 10% of the people who heard MB today have even the slightest inkling of a., b., c. patrice May 2013 #33

Actually you are making up shit as you go and INSIST that's what other people think/do. idwiyo May 2013 #36

Proof? Prove to me that people don't form positive associations, especially in politics, with patrice May 2013 #20

It's up to you to provide proof to your claims. Also, your demand that I prove a negative sounds idwiyo May 2013 #35

k, sorry about proving a negative! How about, just say, "People don't form positive political patrice May 2013 #38

I prefer not to make claims about how other people form political associations. I would need those idwiyo May 2013 #45

Wow... Even The President Said She Had A Valid Point... WillyT May 2013 #10

I see nothing about Medea Benjamin at the link. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #11

Medea Benjamin is a loudmouthed, disrespectful individual that should be thankful... Pragdem May 2013 #12

As Was... Mahatma Ghandi, Martin Luther King Jr., Ceasar Chavez... And Hundreds Of Others... WillyT May 2013 #14

That doesn't mean EVERY loudmouth is Mahatma Ghandi, MLK, or Ceasar Chaves. wow. patrice May 2013 #22

Yeah, he should have raised his scepter woo me with science May 2013 #15

Cmon, say it. You know you want to. Canuckistanian May 2013 #24

Have you ever met Medea? FarPoint May 2013 #32

I read the title on the latest page and thought: Warren Stupidity May 2013 #23

your attempt at alliteration was affirmed KG May 2013 #26

Address the point: RP gets political benefit to his whole agenda because of a favorable endoresement patrice May 2013 #31

Your "point" is pure BS unless you can prove it. :) idwiyo May 2013 #37

What do you have to say of this favorable endorsement of Tom Coburn? Bluenorthwest May 2013 #44

I admire that someone doesn't think a friend's honest disagreement makes that person a bad patrice May 2013 #47

The Rachel Maddow Show: Tom Coburn Caught Lying About His Role in Ensign Affair Bluenorthwest May 2013 #55

Well, honesty is a criteria for positive regard, so now PO needs to re-assess his sense of TC. patrice May 2013 #77

I fully addressed the point you were making. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #54

This is a BS thread. OP ought to delete this crap. Comrade Grumpy May 2013 #34

It's BS to say "People form positive political associations on little or no information"? Yes or no? patrice May 2013 #39

When you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging. Comrade Grumpy May 2013 #40

Why can't I get anyone to answer a simple question: Do people form positive political associations patrice May 2013 #41

You formed this OP out of no information at all, so I guess anything goes. Bluenorthwest May 2013 #43

No it doesn't answer. You are evading. Once again: Do people form positive political associations patrice May 2013 #48

Upthread you claim that utter praise for Coburn does not form postive political associations when Bluenorthwest May 2013 #59

It doesn't form positive associations with me because I KNOW about TC. Most people probably do not patrice May 2013 #73

Just admit that you made a lot of statements based on assumptions that are not supported by facts. idwiyo May 2013 #92

Wow, this OP is a lie. This bullshit should be deleted and replaced with an apology. Bluenorthwest May 2013 #42

I look forward to Medea Benjamin doing the responsible thing & correcting my "mistake" if necessary. patrice May 2013 #49

Madea Benjamin doesn't have to correct anything vanlassie May 2013 #52

But what are you talking about patrice? Your OP is YOUR words and the link has nothing about her. Bluenorthwest May 2013 #57

Typical 'moderate centrist' expecting liberals to clean up your mistakes, mendacities and messes. Bluenorthwest May 2013 #58

It's an opinion. ucrdem May 2013 #50

an opinion based on .... ? bobduca May 2013 #60

Based on Media Benjamin's support for Ron Paul who defends the murder of innocents enabled by wide patrice May 2013 #80

Not deleted burnodo May 2013 #86

Hippie Punching bobduca May 2013 #90

she's been an attention whore from day one dlwickham May 2013 #51

Fail. Hell Hath No Fury May 2013 #53

That's nice to see. Now if Medea or CP would make some statement about that UN Treaty patrice May 2013 #69

i.e. she heckled Obama Enrique May 2013 #56

This post was alerted on. The jury voted 5/1 to let it stand. ohiosmith May 2013 #61

I'm fine with that. It keeps the record clear about who the op is and what the op's intentions are. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #65

Indeed. I'll never take this one seriously again. Marr May 2013 #67

Notice how NO ONE in this thread gave a moments consideration to a relationship between patrice May 2013 #71

Maybe because it's just a transparent and flimsy smear? /nt Marr May 2013 #83

Maybe because one or more of a whole lot of other reasons, too. Can you think of any others? patrice May 2013 #85

Smear? Has Benjamin expressed positive regard for Rand Paul? Are assault weapons markets patrice May 2013 #87

Do statements based on unsubstantiated assumptions make one look silly? Yes, they do! :) idwiyo May 2013 #93

Correction, no one in this thread gives consideration to your assumptions about relationship between idwiyo May 2013 #95

Wow this is impressive.. I never met a mind reader before... SomethingFishy May 2013 #62

I miss UNREC. City Lights May 2013 #64

You ought to be ashamed of this. Marr May 2013 #66

I'm not. I'm proud. I'm ashamed that DU insults people they don't agree with. patrice May 2013 #88

LMFAO!!! SomethingFishy May 2013 #94

You're projecting again. Marr May 2013 #98

I don't see credible evidence for your assertions. LWolf May 2013 #68

Look at all of the DU-ers who insult me, because I make a connection between drones & asault weapons patrice May 2013 #70

No dear. That's not what's happening. vanlassie May 2013 #72

Look at all the people who called you out on your baseless smear by association! bobduca May 2013 #74

Do you agree with this statement: People form positive associations for politicians based on little patrice May 2013 #75

Sure, people make associations, like 'baseless smears by association.' bobduca May 2013 #79

A real Liberal would defend those being murdered because of wide-open assault weapons markets patrice May 2013 #81

"Real Liberal" I see, but you asked me if I think Rand Paul is Liberal... Disingenuous much? bobduca May 2013 #82

Perhaps the connection between drones & assault weapons is baseless to you. It isn't to others.nt patrice May 2013 #84

you are being intentionally obtuse bobduca May 2013 #91

Uh...she was there protesting the use of drones. Nor has she ever supported assault weapons. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #76

She supports Rand Paul who supports one of the biggest causes of drone programs, wide open assault patrice May 2013 #78

Does she support the use of drones or assault weapons? Have a link to that? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #89

Gun-controllers think you are fulla beans. Take a hint. Eleanors38 May 2013 #101

Obama has repeatedly waived sanctions against countries using child soldiers. achile May 2013 #96

+1 burnodo May 2013 #100

Hearts and Flowers from Code Pink to Ron Paul davidpdx May 2013 #97

Code Pink were praising him until he stated that killing Americans by drone is okay. Fire Walk With Me May 2013 #99