Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here we go again: I-5 bridge over Skagit River (Washington) collapses; cars in water [View all]dixiegrrrrl
(60,161 posts)39. Good page of pics, here:
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here we go again: I-5 bridge over Skagit River (Washington) collapses; cars in water [View all]
Brickbat
May 2013
OP
But, um, TAXES!! We can't go around paying for shit that we can't see, like bridge maintenance.
arcane1
May 2013
#22
the bridge was built in the 50s, with a supposed life-span of about 50 years, sufficiency rating =
HiPointDem
May 2013
#75
DOT rep didn't know the last time it was inspected. I don't have the knowledge to debate on
HiPointDem
May 2013
#80
We're not talking about the member that is designed to take a vehicle hitting it
madokie
May 2013
#83
where'd you get the idea only two cars were on the bridge? Three cars went in the water, and
HiPointDem
May 2013
#76
I was working at a daily newspaper during the collapse of the Minnesota bridge.
Brickbat
May 2013
#25
well, thanks bart. not. dot doesn't keep records of bridge inspections? what.the.fuck.
HiPointDem
May 2013
#29
There's no money for infrastructure upkeep--the military industrial complex needed it
Arugula Latte
May 2013
#21
Gorgeous drive. But it sends a shiver up my spine. Commerce is going to suffer too.
nolabear
May 2013
#45
"Functionally obsolete" doesnt mean unsafe. I think you will find that a truck damaged the bridge
rhett o rick
May 2013
#50