Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here we go again: I-5 bridge over Skagit River (Washington) collapses; cars in water [View all]chillfactor
(7,694 posts)40. thank you for the link....
the pictures are spectacular..people sitting on top of their vehicles
thank goodness it doesn't look to be as horrible as the bridge collapse in Minnesota
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here we go again: I-5 bridge over Skagit River (Washington) collapses; cars in water [View all]
Brickbat
May 2013
OP
But, um, TAXES!! We can't go around paying for shit that we can't see, like bridge maintenance.
arcane1
May 2013
#22
the bridge was built in the 50s, with a supposed life-span of about 50 years, sufficiency rating =
HiPointDem
May 2013
#75
DOT rep didn't know the last time it was inspected. I don't have the knowledge to debate on
HiPointDem
May 2013
#80
We're not talking about the member that is designed to take a vehicle hitting it
madokie
May 2013
#83
where'd you get the idea only two cars were on the bridge? Three cars went in the water, and
HiPointDem
May 2013
#76
I was working at a daily newspaper during the collapse of the Minnesota bridge.
Brickbat
May 2013
#25
well, thanks bart. not. dot doesn't keep records of bridge inspections? what.the.fuck.
HiPointDem
May 2013
#29
There's no money for infrastructure upkeep--the military industrial complex needed it
Arugula Latte
May 2013
#21
Gorgeous drive. But it sends a shiver up my spine. Commerce is going to suffer too.
nolabear
May 2013
#45
"Functionally obsolete" doesnt mean unsafe. I think you will find that a truck damaged the bridge
rhett o rick
May 2013
#50