Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Experts react to the foreclosure settlement [View all]
Experts react to the foreclosure settlement
Posted by Sarah Kliff, Ezra Klein and Suzy Khimm
<...>
Elizabeth Warren, Democratic candidate for Senate in Massachusetts (news statement):
Todays settlement shows a significant commitment to helping struggling homeowners stay in their homes. But it needs to be the beginning, not the end, of efforts to hold the big banks accountable with meaningful penalties that demonstrate the rules and the law apply to everyone, no matter who your friends are or how many lobbyists and lawyers you can hire. Moving forward, further investigation and prosecution are needed to bring our long national mortgage nightmare to an end.
Dean Baker, co-director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research:
Im not thrilled with the settlement, since it doesnt accomplish much, but at least it doesnt preclude further civil or criminal suits. In terms of the commitment of payments in the form of write-downs, we dont have a clear counterfactual that allows us to gage how much would have been written down anyhow. We also have the peculiar situation where the banks get to pay the penalty with write-downs of debts to MBS investors.
The big plus is that the settlement does not preclude further legal action on securities fraud and other issues. (New York Attorney General Eric) Schneiderman and the other holdouts deserve credit for this.
Ira Rheingold, director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates:
Theres a number of pieces that are a good step forward for a lot of home owners but it doesnt do nearly enough to solve the problem...the part that could end up being most impactful are the new standards for how people will be treated if they wind up in default, what kind of protocol banks have to follow if someone requests a loan modification. Going forward, I think that and the principal reductions will be the most meaningful parts of this. Im hoping that these new standards, going forward, will help consumers understand and get loan modifications in the future.
Karen Nussbaum, executive director of Working America:
The $26 billion is not what we wanted. We were hoping for much more. This is like pocket change. So we hope this is a down payment, and were hoping to see more positive action coming out of this federal investigations unit. But only a handful of people are actually going to have their payments reduced, and the people who have already lost their homes will get $2,000. That doesnt come close to fixing the problem...this just doesnt add up to the kind of relief that people actually need to stay in their homes.
- more-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/experts-react-to-the-foreclosure-settlement/2012/02/09/gIQALQhz1Q_blog.html
Posted by Sarah Kliff, Ezra Klein and Suzy Khimm
<...>
Elizabeth Warren, Democratic candidate for Senate in Massachusetts (news statement):
Todays settlement shows a significant commitment to helping struggling homeowners stay in their homes. But it needs to be the beginning, not the end, of efforts to hold the big banks accountable with meaningful penalties that demonstrate the rules and the law apply to everyone, no matter who your friends are or how many lobbyists and lawyers you can hire. Moving forward, further investigation and prosecution are needed to bring our long national mortgage nightmare to an end.
Dean Baker, co-director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research:
Im not thrilled with the settlement, since it doesnt accomplish much, but at least it doesnt preclude further civil or criminal suits. In terms of the commitment of payments in the form of write-downs, we dont have a clear counterfactual that allows us to gage how much would have been written down anyhow. We also have the peculiar situation where the banks get to pay the penalty with write-downs of debts to MBS investors.
The big plus is that the settlement does not preclude further legal action on securities fraud and other issues. (New York Attorney General Eric) Schneiderman and the other holdouts deserve credit for this.
Ira Rheingold, director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates:
Theres a number of pieces that are a good step forward for a lot of home owners but it doesnt do nearly enough to solve the problem...the part that could end up being most impactful are the new standards for how people will be treated if they wind up in default, what kind of protocol banks have to follow if someone requests a loan modification. Going forward, I think that and the principal reductions will be the most meaningful parts of this. Im hoping that these new standards, going forward, will help consumers understand and get loan modifications in the future.
Karen Nussbaum, executive director of Working America:
The $26 billion is not what we wanted. We were hoping for much more. This is like pocket change. So we hope this is a down payment, and were hoping to see more positive action coming out of this federal investigations unit. But only a handful of people are actually going to have their payments reduced, and the people who have already lost their homes will get $2,000. That doesnt come close to fixing the problem...this just doesnt add up to the kind of relief that people actually need to stay in their homes.
- more-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/experts-react-to-the-foreclosure-settlement/2012/02/09/gIQALQhz1Q_blog.html
25 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Or if you're not a pessimist.. Tepid settlement, with lots of silver linings. A good start.
tridim
Feb 2012
#2
How could you read those four statements and NOT come to a negative conclusion?
MrCoffee
Feb 2012
#5
Because I didn't do what you just did and cherry pick the negative and ignore the positive.
tridim
Feb 2012
#8
Point out the positive. Not the pie-in-the-sky hopes and dreams, the concrete positive.
MrCoffee
Feb 2012
#10
The positive is clearly stated in the two paragraphs you stripped out of his statement
tridim
Feb 2012
#11