Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Some guns are clearly for hunting humans and some 501(c)(4)s are Republican Fronts. onehandle May 2013 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Nimajneb Nilknarf May 2013 #6
"Assault rifles are rifles of mass destruction." Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #2
What do you consider them? Hoyt May 2013 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author premium May 2013 #4
Small arms, obviously. Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #22
They are "weapons of mass destruction" in our country. They are coveted for their killing power. Hoyt May 2013 #24
+1. They exist for no other reason than to kill humans. AndyA May 2013 #27
Thanks, Doctor Hoyt. Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #34
College professors are propagandists ..... oldhippie May 2013 #7
Where does the second amendment mention hunting? n/t X_Digger May 2013 #5
The Second is not about hunting. It is about the Eleanors38 May 2013 #8
The 2A is about defense of 'free state' tblue May 2013 #21
The preamble is. Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #23
Second Amendment AndyA May 2013 #29
What about the part that says: The Straight Story May 2013 #33
The people have a right to bear arms AndyA May 2013 #36
I think you want it to say that, but that is not what it says The Straight Story May 2013 #44
So the intent of the founders was to allow mass murders of children in schools? AndyA May 2013 #45
Um... society didn't tolerate it The Straight Story May 2013 #46
Um...society IS tolerating it AndyA May 2013 #53
Well = effectively Regulated = controlled by laws tblue May 2013 #47
I disagree that the preamble acts as an unconditional modifier. Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #35
I see it differently AndyA May 2013 #39
While I don't agree with your linguistic analysis... Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #41
"..our Constitution guarantees our individual right to bear arms" - Barack Obama May 2013 hack89 May 2013 #52
the constitutional scholar has spoken. Niceguy1 May 2013 #54
The right to life trumps the right to bear arms AndyA May 2013 #57
Still doesn't change the fact that Americans have the right to own guns hack89 May 2013 #58
Tell that to survivors of gun violence AndyA May 2013 #59
Americans want changes like universal background checks hack89 May 2013 #60
I don't believe I said anything about outlawing private ownership of guns, or repealing the 2A AndyA May 2013 #61
We have cut our murder rate in half hack89 May 2013 #70
Bullshit AndyA May 2013 #71
Murder rate in 1992 = 9.8 In 2011 it was 4.8 hack89 May 2013 #72
The RKBA is recognized as an individual right, just like... Eleanors38 May 2013 #48
Hmmm. rrneck May 2013 #9
Yeah, I guess ... sucks for them ... Bake May 2013 #10
Why? nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2013 #31
Because I can. Just in case. Bake May 2013 #42
See, this underscores the greater problem in this country. Tommy_Carcetti May 2013 #43
Semi-auto high powered rifles are dangerous, no doubt about it. raouldukelives May 2013 #11
We've forgot about handguns because ARs look so scary NightWatcher May 2013 #12
Assault weapons kill abut 200 people a year. Handguns kill 30,000 a year. hack89 May 2013 #13
I suppose it's because G_j May 2013 #16
A psycho was able to kill even more people with a handgun hack89 May 2013 #19
I suppose it's because Eleanors38 May 2013 #49
Agree, we need to focus on handguns,toting, etc. Although I see no reason not to focus on guns Hoyt May 2013 #17
Every gun made is designed to kill people hack89 May 2013 #20
Of course, you guys wouldn't covet them if harmless, non-intimidating, good for society, etc. Hoyt May 2013 #25
I covet mine because they shoot straight hack89 May 2013 #26
I covet mine because I got them for next to nothing. premium May 2013 #30
I covet mine because they're pieces of history, and one of them is worth more than your car. :) Decoy of Fenris May 2013 #62
Pieces of history -- used to kill hundreds of thousands. Not inspiring if you ask me. Hoyt May 2013 #63
Pieces of history -- used to save hundreds of millions. Also, to shape the modern world. Decoy of Fenris May 2013 #64
Some people are attracted to seedy stuff. Hoyt May 2013 #68
Part of my Family History oneshooter May 2013 #65
They were talking about "assault" weapons. You guys with guns in your user name Hoyt May 2013 #67
"if you ask me", premium May 2013 #66
Collecting guns is on par with collecting swastikas and confederate flags. Hoyt May 2013 #69
About par for the course from you. nt. premium May 2013 #73
Hunting people should be illegal. Orrex May 2013 #14
We could start a White House petition... Pelican May 2013 #15
There was a movie made about hunting humans, premium May 2013 #32
That movie is so bad that it's part of the reason why it should be illegal Orrex May 2013 #37
Yeah, it really wasn't that good. premium May 2013 #38
It is. Eleanors38 May 2013 #50
Then why are guns for hunting people different? Orrex May 2013 #55
"Hunting people" is a systematic plan to kill humans... Eleanors38 May 2013 #56
The First Commandment? derby378 May 2013 #18
What a classic Fudd. aikoaiko May 2013 #28
Which type of gun HASN'T been made to hunt people? NickB79 May 2013 #40
Yeah, like muskets.. Fla_Democrat May 2013 #51
The kids and I managed to squeeze in some time with the AR's yesterday. ileus May 2013 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guns for Hunting People A...»Reply #31