Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Guns for Hunting People Are Different: Legislation Should Reflect That [View all]AndyA
(16,993 posts)39. I see it differently
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
It opens with the statement that a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state, then continues with the statement that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. That is one statement. If the well regulated militia were independent from the right to bear arms not being infringed, a period would separate the two. But a comma was used, which meant what follows after the comma is a continuation of the opening statement.
Well regulated is truly the key element. Complete, thorough rules and regulations. We don't have that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Guns for Hunting People Are Different: Legislation Should Reflect That [View all]
xchrom
May 2013
OP
Some guns are clearly for hunting humans and some 501(c)(4)s are Republican Fronts.
onehandle
May 2013
#1
They are "weapons of mass destruction" in our country. They are coveted for their killing power.
Hoyt
May 2013
#24
"..our Constitution guarantees our individual right to bear arms" - Barack Obama May 2013
hack89
May 2013
#52
I don't believe I said anything about outlawing private ownership of guns, or repealing the 2A
AndyA
May 2013
#61
Agree, we need to focus on handguns,toting, etc. Although I see no reason not to focus on guns
Hoyt
May 2013
#17
Of course, you guys wouldn't covet them if harmless, non-intimidating, good for society, etc.
Hoyt
May 2013
#25
I covet mine because they're pieces of history, and one of them is worth more than your car. :)
Decoy of Fenris
May 2013
#62
Pieces of history -- used to kill hundreds of thousands. Not inspiring if you ask me.
Hoyt
May 2013
#63
Pieces of history -- used to save hundreds of millions. Also, to shape the modern world.
Decoy of Fenris
May 2013
#64