Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bill Clinton to Reich: "I don't need a Republican Labor Secretary; I've got you!" closeupready May 2013 #1
No. Reich makes clear he's a Democrat. Octafish May 2013 #33
You're a day late and a dollar short, kid. closeupready May 2013 #35
Thanks for setting me straight on Reich and NAFTA. I thought the topic was Wall Street. Octafish May 2013 #36
No problem. closeupready May 2013 #37
Pritzker 4Q2u2 May 2013 #2
He's right. Lasher May 2013 #3
Well Reich too has his own skeletons IMO Populist_Prole May 2013 #4
Perhaps his biggest failing is his inability to say, "I was wrong." closeupready May 2013 #6
IMO, that inability is not due to arrogance but to extreme wonkishness on his part Populist_Prole May 2013 #7
Yeah, that's likely the case. But then again, I'd suggest that closeupready May 2013 #8
How can anyone "like" Robert Rubin? Reich had his chance, followed orders, did a little good byeya May 2013 #12
So you dont like Reich? What about what he says per this OP? nm rhett o rick May 2013 #17
You didn't get the shoot the messenger memo. hay rick May 2013 #18
I don't _dislike_ him, I just can't take him seriously Populist_Prole May 2013 #22
Elizabeth Warren Slams ‘Dangerous’ Legislation That Would Weaken Wall Street Reform ProSense May 2013 #5
Robert Reich would have more credibility if he would publicly come out in opposition to NAFTA. AnotherMcIntosh May 2013 #9
We get it that you dont like Reich. What do you think of the OP? nm rhett o rick May 2013 #19
Reich is right. But, IMO, he would have more credibility if he would now publicly oppose NAFTA. AnotherMcIntosh May 2013 #23
Economists like trade bhikkhu May 2013 #26
Your suggestion is to take school seriously? AnotherMcIntosh May 2013 #27
Baloney. Automation has NOTHING to do with this. This is more globalist propaganda. duffyduff May 2013 #31
How dicredited and debunked? bhikkhu May 2013 #32
Who needed Reagan when Wall St had Clinton? He supported as bad back then, I agree, but Dragonfli May 2013 #21
I'm glad that he is raising the points. I would also be happy if he would take a stand against NAFTA AnotherMcIntosh May 2013 #24
He owes us that much at the very least, it would also add to whatever credibility Dragonfli May 2013 #25
democrats sold their soul for a seat a the table under voodoo economics. pansypoo53219 May 2013 #10
Du rec. Nt xchrom May 2013 #11
The Robert Reich who worked for Clinton? That Reich? merrily May 2013 #13
Do you disagree with the OP or not? nm rhett o rick May 2013 #20
attack the messenger and ignore the content. bush policies under new management nt msongs May 2013 #14
Another ProSense May 2013 #15
K&R Cleita May 2013 #16
well, to actually answer his question (though it should be obvious)... tomp May 2013 #28
he's right on this one, but he's a hypocrite markiv May 2013 #29
Fight it in Republicans and it will disappear from Democrats gulliver May 2013 #30
Corruption I mean De-Regulation is Buy-Partisan Octafish May 2013 #34
K&R nt limpyhobbler May 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Reich: Who needs R...»Reply #20