Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cprise

(8,445 posts)
24. Its a checkered thing, actually
Fri May 24, 2013, 10:33 PM
May 2013

The examples of China and USSR (Stalin's "non-left" communism) leave tons to be desired. And though Marx practically had capitalism pegged, his prescribed remedies don't hold up to scrutiny IMHO.

In an age where people have increasing access to knowledge, commitment to democracy becomes ever more the important ingredient. On the whole, having socialists compete with capitalists within democratic domains has yielded very good results. This is what I consider to be social democracy.

There is also the tiny problem of radicals, once they gain some scrap of power, becoming a target-practice pastime in this hemisphere at least. MLK was moving toward radical views in the weeks before he was murdered; I won't even get into what goes on to this day in our "great abroad".

Finally, false-flag terrorism is a recurring tactic of the modern Right. That one will take a lot of savvy communication and understanding to overcome.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why Liberals Need Radicals [View all] xchrom May 2013 OP
society needs effective radicals. nt geek tragedy May 2013 #1
That is right. Without Malcom, Martin would've been more widely ignored, and more easily leveymg May 2013 #2
The Soviet Union was an industrial disaster and hemorraged money until it's last dying day. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #3
That's not the point -- it was a counterweight to capitalism starroute May 2013 #9
The Soviet Union was never a real counterweight and never functioned well at all. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #10
But the extreme capitalists THOUGHT it was......... lastlib May 2013 #11
The extreme capitalist thought about and did what suited his economic interests. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #12
That's exactly right. laundry_queen May 2013 #25
I tend to agree with his premise... kentuck May 2013 #4
I would posit that the problem is that what pass for geek tragedy May 2013 #6
Actually, the shift was to the radicals of identity politics cprise May 2013 #13
If they co-operated on the left the "identity" politicians... socialist_n_TN May 2013 #20
Its a checkered thing, actually cprise May 2013 #24
The degenerated revolution of Stalin's USSR and the Chinese....... socialist_n_TN May 2013 #32
Good Point and Good Read...K&R KoKo May 2013 #5
That mutually beneficial alliance is what the authoritarian DLC/3rd way turncoats Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #7
I Think Radical Is The Wrong Term On The Left colsohlibgal May 2013 #8
It is radical, that's the point. It's the correct word that has had the meaning distorted Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #14
You seem to think western Europe lacks radicals cprise May 2013 #16
RE: your second paragraph.......... socialist_n_TN May 2013 #22
And here I am with my reformist tagline cprise May 2013 #26
Well in my view, the problem with liberalism is not a new thing..... socialist_n_TN May 2013 #33
LOL cprise May 2013 #36
Whew! I get enough grief there...... socialist_n_TN May 2013 #37
K&R marmar May 2013 #15
The labels have become meaningless. bvar22 May 2013 #17
Radical and mainstream are not mutually exclusive cprise May 2013 #29
Kick and Rec! Fuddnik May 2013 #18
here's the big problem. BobbyBoring May 2013 #19
Having a radical movement that is viable Politicub May 2013 #21
The labels have become meaningless. bvar22 May 2013 #23
I don't disagree with your position or post; Dyedinthewoolliberal May 2013 #27
It's deeper than radicals here in the US. Some people think that during the cold war craigmatic May 2013 #28
... RainDog May 2013 #30
Assuming the radicals are not armed militants cprise May 2013 #31
"The American left remained strong into the mid-20th century..." ProSense May 2013 #34
So Communism is the reason Liberals exist according Progressive dog May 2013 #35
I don't think that's what the article is saying......... socialist_n_TN May 2013 #38
I exaggerated the silly claim made in the OP Progressive dog May 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Liberals Need Radical...»Reply #24