Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Medea Benjamin, March 7: “progressives should Stand with Rand” [View all]ucrdem
(15,720 posts)4. But Rand doesn't want to close Guantanamo:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013:
I dont know that I have a great answer, to tell you the truth, said the Kentucky Republican, later adding, I have not come down on the position of closing Guantanamo Bay.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/17/paul-father-and-son-differ-on-issue-of-closing-gua/?page=all
He doesn't really give a shit about using drones overseas, either. Benjamin even says that in her ridiculous article:
He did not ask the government to stop the practice of hitting the same area twice, often times killing rescuers who are trying to help the victims of the first strike. He was not asking the government to take drones out of the hands of the CIA, a civilian agency that is supposed to focus on intelligence gathering. He did not ask for an accounting of civilian casualties overseas, and that the US publicly acknowledge when it kills civilians. Although he mentioned the case of 16-year-old US citizen Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, killed in a drone strike in Yemen two weeks after his father was killed, he did not demand a response from the government.
Believe it or not that entire filibuster stunt in April was supposedly about getting the CIA to stop using drones domestically, which, as far as I know, is a total figment of his toupee.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rand Paul and Ron Paul's John Birch Society views should not be tolerated in 2013 whatsoever.
graham4anything
May 2013
#1
Yes, that was cute. I have the one with all the rec's and the 'I'll never vote Dem again' list.
freshwest
Jul 2013
#57
President Obama has attempted this three times. It takes CONGRESS (owned by repubs) to do it
graham4anything
May 2013
#3
Openly supporting Republican and third-party candidates used to me instant banning from DU.
Buzz Clik
May 2013
#27
Fuck anyone that allies with teabaggers/libertarians for any reason. You are a parasite. nt
Pragdem
May 2013
#34
I thought the drone program was a crime before Rand ever opened his pie hole
whatchamacallit
May 2013
#48