CONFIRMED: Fox News Hack James Rosen Is A Political Operative, Not A Journalist

[SlimJimmy]

64. Did you read anything I wrote?

I said you cited the wrong US Code and you haven't even addressed it. I outlined the limited circumstances in my reply, but apparently you missed that as well. Please, please ... actually read what I write and respond to it. That's how a message board works. It's getting frustrating to answer you just to have you come back with the same stuff each time.

As to prosecuting Rosen ... oh *yes* they were trying to prosecute him. He is named as a co-conspirator in the affidavit. That means the government thinks he committed a CRIME. The fact that they *haven't* prosecuted him shows just how weak their case is. And trust me, it's *very* weak.

So, to summarize. Please answer my question from the previous reply. What US Code applies here? The one you cited is wrong as it only applies to cryptographic and cipher equipment.

Please re-read my previous reply to see why his political/personal motivations are *not* a crime.

Please read the *actual* affidavit in support of the search warrant. It is very enlightening and will help you with the US Code question.

He wasn't having a casual conversation with Kim. He was seeking out classified information for personal and political gain. No one is trying to prosecute Rosen. That is the red herring that makes the criticism of a legal search warrant bogus. The target for prosecution is Kim. Leaking classified information is illegal, and if you get caught up in the leak of such information, you can expect to be held accountable.