Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,152 posts)
6. We should note the only connection to Monsanto is Ingram suggests there could be one
Sat May 25, 2013, 02:53 PM
May 2013

The only mention of Monsanto is his quote: "Knowing that Monsanto and the Dept. of Ag are in bed together, one has to wonder if Monsanto was behind the theft to ruin my research that may prove Round-Up was, and is, killing honeybees."

So he speculates, without any evidence beyond "they do things together", and without drawing a conclusion. The globalreasearch writer has changed that (from over a year ago) to a straight statement of fact: "Behind the obvious violations of his Constitutional rights is Monsanto". I can find no developments in the story since the bees were confiscated.

It comes down to: do you trust government scientists to accurately detect diseases? Or do you think they are in the pay of priavte companies, and will lie?

I wonder what the point of the confiscation would be, anyway, from Monsanto's point of view. If Ingram says that most bees are not resistant to Roundup, but his were, what would the confiscation of them prove? All the bees vulnerable to Roundup would still exist - and they'd be the problem for Monsanto. Monsanto would benefit from someone saying "see, some bees are unaffected by the product".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Illinois illegally seizes...»Reply #6