Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "That Woman Is WORTH Paying Attention To": Medea Benjamin Explains WHY She DISRUPTED Obama’s Speech [View all]Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)67. The point is to state everything known so that a clear picture of the issue can be obtained. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"That Woman Is WORTH Paying Attention To": Medea Benjamin Explains WHY She DISRUPTED Obama’s Speech [View all]
Segami
May 2013
OP
So, do you vehemently disagree with the President's statement, or are you just calling him a liar?
Dragonfli
May 2013
#46
I mean, sometimes I think some of these folks have simply GOT to be joshing around.
Number23
May 2013
#80
It was a very clear one line reply to the post title, since you speak for the poster,
Dragonfli
May 2013
#95
A one line reply to a title of a post? what else did that weird sentence mean?
Dragonfli
May 2013
#85
The president is very familiar with Medea Benjamin and at one time when he was running for office
sabrina 1
May 2013
#102
Anwar al-Awlaki's son was NOT the target of the drone, senior Al-Qaeda member Ibrahim al-Banna was
Tx4obama
May 2013
#4
You're a "journalist", Can you support your claim or not? How do you know he's....
Tarheel_Dem
May 2013
#112
The Left is so desperate to make the son an innocent victim that they ignore any and
bluestate10
May 2013
#18
casual dismissal of targeted assassinations of US citizens by our government is more sickening
Dragonfli
May 2013
#69
The kid was NOT the one being targeted. Al-Banna was the target and he was not a US citizen. n/t
Tx4obama
May 2013
#74
He wasn't killed by our drone? I am glad to hear it, I thought we killed a kid! my apologies.
Dragonfli
May 2013
#77
You are the one that said our government targeted a US Citizen. Al-Banna was the target ...
Tx4obama
May 2013
#79
Killing is illusion and a word is what is important then? I thought what happened was important
Dragonfli
May 2013
#82
You have no clue what I think or feel, but I do think you're being rude. Have a great weekend. n/t
Tx4obama
May 2013
#84
And you kind sir, have a continued compassionate empathic day! You express your grief well!
Dragonfli
May 2013
#86
I apologize Ms TX4, I just thought such callousness was more likely a male trait.
Dragonfli
May 2013
#89
She's being compassionate in a way you cannot possibly comprehend
ConservativeDemocrat
May 2013
#130
So you're not part of 'the left'? Then why are you posting here, this is not a right wing
sabrina 1
May 2013
#103
I did NOT say 'but if he was he had it coming'. I take issue with your use of quotation marks. n/t
Tx4obama
May 2013
#62
The point is to state everything known so that a clear picture of the issue can be obtained. n/t
Tx4obama
May 2013
#67
They chose to support a filibuster, not an entire agenda of one man, you have
Dragonfli
May 2013
#57
I think I would be very concerned if you felt any different, I don't want the respect of a silly...,
Dragonfli
May 2013
#88
My concern is - are they laying the groundwork for a republi-CON to get back into the White House?
calimary
May 2013
#25
Gotta say I saw that photo of Code Pink valentines to rand paul, and I immediately
calimary
May 2013
#120
Wait-- I thought finding common ground with political opponents to achieve specific
Marr
May 2013
#30
You should be ashamed of yourself for implying that agreeing with Rand Paul on filibuster
idwiyo
May 2013
#73
Supporting RPs filibuster against torturer is shameful but supporting torture is OK.
idwiyo
May 2013
#96
I know, I just like to remind him (since the time he argued against single payer HC here)
Dragonfli
May 2013
#116
I can bet you a £100 Sid is never going to emigrate. :) He is "do as I say, not as I do" type.
idwiyo
May 2013
#141
"Staging a photo-op" to show support for filibustering a torturer's nomination as a head of CIA is
idwiyo
May 2013
#113
K&R...So many on Dem Site who want to trash Activists...and call them "Naderites and Haters."
KoKo
May 2013
#9
A democrat is only a democrat IF that person agrees with your viewpoints? nt
bluestate10
May 2013
#20
Like agreeing with that criminal Brennan? or Signature strikes? Or a double tap terrorist strategy?
Dragonfli
May 2013
#49
Was happy to have Medea on my show a few weeks back. I dont agree with everything she says
stevenleser
May 2013
#34
Sending chocolate in support of opposing a torturer is deadly and evil you know
Dragonfli
May 2013
#64
She still needs to speak against unregulated Assault Weapons trade to earn my respect on the drone
patrice
May 2013
#55
Has she issued an apology yet to President Obama yet for being rude and disrespectful?
Tx4obama
May 2013
#76
What was the subtle point that I missed? I'd like to know what went over my head.
Marr
May 2013
#101
Okay she is a loony..she thinks Pakistan will help us capture someone? Crazy crazy woman.
dkf
May 2013
#119
In matters of conscience, the law of majority has no place. - Gandhi
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2013
#129