General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fox learned about the subpoena nearly three years ago (updated) [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Not with anything significant, anyway. You are using the tactic of *announcing* an update as though there were something significant in it, when there isn't. You insult your audience by assuming that they will not actually read what you have put here, or read the thread I linked.
This is merely another version of posting blue links to irrelevant articles or to articles that actually say the opposite of what you claim they say.
You continue to ignore the fact that the code you put here does not apply to Rosen for very specific reasons outlined by SlimJimmy in the previous thread, including that Rosen would have had to have knowledge that the classified information would be detrimental to the US or abet a foreign nation, or that he transferred the information to anyone not entitled to receive it. The affidavit addresses none of this, which is probably another reason why, as SlimJimmy pointed out above, the Justice Department had to go "judge shopping" in order to get the warrant approved:
Again, I encourage anyone reading this thread to read carefully this OP and then to read carefully the thread I linked to confirm that there is absolutely nothing in this trumpeted "update" that redeems a vacant argument.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022897356
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022897356#post20