organization and reporter, and for continued (never ending) surveillance of his e-mail and phone lines. Clearly, you *still* haven't read the affidavit in support of the warrant or the motions that surrounded it. It took them three tries to get it hidden. That's what we call "judge shopping", and is really unbelievable considering the high bar set for the DOJ in these cases.

That you continue to support the DOJ in its assault against the first amendment is astounding to me. Were you this supportive of the DOJ when classified information was released multiple times by the New York Times? I don't notice any threads by you that asked for the reporters to be charged? Clearly they were attempting to damage the Bush administration with the leaks. You know, political/personal motives. What about your support of the DOJ when they went after the reporters in the Pentagon Papers case? Did you ask for the heads of reporters in any of these cases?

Funny that, I don't think you did.

The AG has a lot to answer for. I'm sure we'll be hearing more about it sooner rather than later.