Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(29,555 posts)

1. Why wouldn't the WSJ attempt to muddy the waters?

Mon May 27, 2013, 05:31 PM

May 2013

Ruprecht Morlock's minions publish it along with FAUX 'News.'

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

News Corp. Was Notified on DOJ's Records Seizures [View all] ProSense May 2013 OP

Why wouldn't the WSJ attempt to muddy the waters? Cirque du So-What May 2013 #1

Has Faux EVER told the truth? zbdent May 2013 #2