HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Fox learned about the sub... » Reply #69

Response to George Gently (Reply #66)

Tue May 28, 2013, 07:51 AM

69. No, it's you that are confused. A subpoena *was* issued for his phone records subsequent to the

approval of the search warrant. All applicable DOJ rules still apply.

News Corporation said on Sunday that it had no record of being notified by the Justice Department nearly three years ago of a subpoena for the telephone records of a reporter at its Fox News cable channel. The company’s chief legal counsel at the time also said that he had never seen material from the government related to the subpoena.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/business/media/news-corp-says-it-was-not-told-of-subpoena-for-reporters-phone-records.html

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 92 replies Author Time Post
ProSense May 2013 OP
longship May 2013 #1
CatWoman May 2013 #4
ProSense May 2013 #5
Buzz Clik May 2013 #76
Major Hogwash May 2013 #2
JaneyVee May 2013 #3
Historic NY May 2013 #6
George Gently May 2013 #7
George Gently May 2013 #8
ProSense May 2013 #9
limpyhobbler May 2013 #10
ProSense May 2013 #11
limpyhobbler May 2013 #12
ProSense May 2013 #13
limpyhobbler May 2013 #14
ProSense May 2013 #15
limpyhobbler May 2013 #16
ProSense May 2013 #17
limpyhobbler May 2013 #18
ProSense May 2013 #19
George Gently May 2013 #20
limpyhobbler May 2013 #21
ProSense May 2013 #22
limpyhobbler May 2013 #23
ProSense May 2013 #24
George Gently May 2013 #25
limpyhobbler May 2013 #27
George Gently May 2013 #26
limpyhobbler May 2013 #28
George Gently May 2013 #29
limpyhobbler May 2013 #30
George Gently May 2013 #31
woo me with science May 2013 #44
George Gently May 2013 #92
davidpdx May 2013 #84
dumbcat May 2013 #75
George Gently May 2013 #77
dumbcat May 2013 #79
George Gently May 2013 #82
dumbcat May 2013 #85
dumbcat May 2013 #86
woo me with science May 2013 #32
ProSense May 2013 #33
ProSense May 2013 #34
George Gently May 2013 #35
SlimJimmy May 2013 #38
George Gently May 2013 #40
SlimJimmy May 2013 #41
ProSense May 2013 #42
SlimJimmy May 2013 #48
ProSense May 2013 #50
George Gently May 2013 #45
SlimJimmy May 2013 #47
ProSense May 2013 #49
SlimJimmy May 2013 #51
ProSense May 2013 #53
SlimJimmy May 2013 #55
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply .
ProSense May 2013 #56
SlimJimmy May 2013 #57
ProSense May 2013 #58
SlimJimmy May 2013 #62
George Gently May 2013 #52
SlimJimmy May 2013 #54
George Gently May 2013 #59
SlimJimmy May 2013 #60
George Gently May 2013 #61
SlimJimmy May 2013 #63
George Gently May 2013 #64
SlimJimmy May 2013 #65
George Gently May 2013 #66
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply No, it's you that are confused. A subpoena *was* issued for his phone records subsequent to the
SlimJimmy May 2013 #69
George Gently May 2013 #70
SlimJimmy May 2013 #71
George Gently May 2013 #72
SlimJimmy May 2013 #73
George Gently May 2013 #74
SlimJimmy May 2013 #78
ProSense May 2013 #36
woo me with science May 2013 #43
ProSense May 2013 #46
ProSense May 2013 #37
ProSense May 2013 #39
DevonRex May 2013 #67
uponit7771 May 2013 #83
emulatorloo May 2013 #88
DevonRex May 2013 #89
emulatorloo May 2013 #91
Bobbie Jo May 2013 #90
ucrdem May 2013 #68
uponit7771 May 2013 #80
SlimJimmy May 2013 #87
hrmjustin May 2013 #81
Please login to view edit histories.