Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
6. Who says revolution means violence?
Wed May 29, 2013, 04:03 PM
May 2013

with Democracy in America on life support, it's hard to put much faith in the ideals of it all.

We have to salvage Democracy, and I don't think it can be done without revolutionizing the system.

Much different direction than fomenting senseless violence.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No revolution in the US until we run out of Chalupas and Diet Coke. FSogol May 2013 #1
I'll make/take the chalupas. kentauros May 2013 #12
Nah, the only thing that could prompt these gigantic asses off their couches would Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #21
Especially your last sentence. randome May 2013 #2
In this case I think it's the oligarchs that want revolution. Turbineguy May 2013 #3
The revolution was won in 2008. Why would anyone want to bring back Jeb Bush? graham4anything May 2013 #4
Probably true. Thanks. JDPriestly May 2013 #17
Revolutions are shifts in society. Starry Messenger May 2013 #5
Who says revolution means violence? marions ghost May 2013 #6
The gun culture does. stevenleser May 2013 #7
The Tactical Response nutjob marions ghost May 2013 #11
Lovely and hopeful. Thanks. n/t Laelth May 2013 #8
Yikers. There's quite a bit of misinformation in your op cali May 2013 #9
There was the British aristocracy before the revolution. JDPriestly May 2013 #18
I'm not talking about the Rockefellers cali May 2013 #32
That's why we had the revolution -- to get rid of them. JDPriestly May 2013 #47
revolutions don't normally occur in places with extremely high standards of living like the US arely staircase May 2013 #10
Speaking of revolutions...just read this on Think Progress maddezmom May 2013 #13
Most American Revolutions have not been violent nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #14
John Lennon on revolutions felix_numinous May 2013 #15
Great thoughts, and I admire your optimism...BUT... Whiskeytide May 2013 #16
The money problem is often overstated Chathamization May 2013 #39
I agree with getting people involved... Whiskeytide May 2013 #40
I’ve mostly been doing work Chathamization May 2013 #45
Actually revolutions almost never happen in extreme poverty Recursion May 2013 #19
What do you think the outcome would have been had the liberalization JDPriestly May 2013 #48
I don't think that's strictly true Spider Jerusalem May 2013 #20
Capitalism was in its earlier years. Mercantilism was the economic system. JDPriestly May 2013 #22
Sure, but saying "there was no aristocracy" is ahistorical. Spider Jerusalem May 2013 #23
The Southern planter class saw themselves as aristocratic BainsBane May 2013 #29
depends on what you mean by 'industrial wealth'. HiPointDem May 2013 #25
Manufactures didn't not develop on until after the War of 1812. BainsBane May 2013 #27
i'd disagree. the social order was changing long before the war of 1812. HiPointDem May 2013 #31
mercantilism is not something distinct from capitalism. HiPointDem May 2013 #35
Wrong as usual. John Hancock possessed considerably more wealth than Washington Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #26
according to this, washington was worth half a billion in today's dollars. still pretty rich. HiPointDem May 2013 #34
KnR Hekate May 2013 #24
The Rich Actually Are Different dkf May 2013 #28
"one to make it...etc" is bullshit. do some genealogy of very wealthy families. the three HiPointDem May 2013 #36
You misunderstand the concept of revolution Scootaloo May 2013 #30
We have to tap into this JustAnotherGen May 2013 #33
speaking of inherited wealth; fitzgerald's model for jay gatsby: HiPointDem May 2013 #37
Eh JustAnotherGen May 2013 #38
sorry, i meant tom buchanan. HiPointDem May 2013 #41
I figured! JustAnotherGen May 2013 #42
check out the copy of gatsby fitzgerald gave to hitchcock, though. HiPointDem May 2013 #43
ha ha ha ha JustAnotherGen May 2013 #46
Thanks. I like this very much: JDPriestly May 2013 #49
Obama's election was arguably part of the beginning of a revolution Dash87 May 2013 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Someone on DU began talki...»Reply #6