General Discussion

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)

48. already blocked from the Environment and Energy group for climate denial nonsense

Reply to MattBaggins (Reply #24)

Wed May 29, 2013, 09:11 PM

May 2013

as is Nederland.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

97 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Nederland May 2013 OP

Let us see your data please. That's the question I would ask this scientist because most say byeya May 2013 #1

Exactly byeya fasttense May 2013 #2

Yes. It's my understanding that the sequestered C02 and methane is being loosed into the atmosphere byeya May 2013 #6

That is true Nederland May 2013 #11

People should see the other OP you wrote: "It's not as bad as we thought" CreekDog May 2013 #85

His research is not about how fast climate is changing now caraher May 2013 #4

Actually, that's not what most climate scientists are saying Yo_Mama May 2013 #5

Here you go Nederland May 2013 #8

here's some data Edim May 2013 #13

what most say is irrelevant in science Edim May 2013 #18

Bool-sheet! Dash87 May 2013 #3

I can't take a claim of "we must bury most of the CO2 we produce from burning carbon" seriously muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #7

I would agree Nederland May 2013 #9

Last year, one of the "I'm an engineer and you're not" (tm) types actually said.... Junkdrawer May 2013 #45

This message brought to you by the Oil Industry who no longer denies AGW... Junkdrawer May 2013 #10

Put simply, the cancer is metastasizing, but we're taking stronger pain meds... Junkdrawer May 2013 #12

Hansen is an outlier Nederland May 2013 #16

Myles Allen or James Hansen? Whom to believe???? Junkdrawer May 2013 #20

Not a tough call at all Nederland May 2013 #29

Hansen has been warning us that The Faustian Bargain sits out there since at least 2009.... Junkdrawer May 2013 #34

Irrelevant Nederland May 2013 #67

This is most interesting information you are posting and I thank you for doing so. byeya May 2013 #25

Yes, that is one theory Nederland May 2013 #30

you're saying not to do anything until we can verify exactly what will happen CreekDog May 2013 #50

Yes, let's just wait and see. That's the ticket. GliderGuider May 2013 #63

For a friend.... Junkdrawer May 2013 #64

Thanks! I'm re-posting this previous reply to that article, because it deserves to be said again GliderGuider May 2013 #65

I share the fears...I see the wisdom.... Junkdrawer May 2013 #68

My assumption is that I'm always going to be wrong on something. GliderGuider May 2013 #77

At this point, inventing our way into a full continuation of our current lifestyle.... Junkdrawer May 2013 #78

No I am not Nederland May 2013 #74

Believe it or not Edim May 2013 #14

What non existent problem are you referring to? MattBaggins May 2013 #19

AGW. nt Edim May 2013 #22

Enjoy your time at DU MattBaggins May 2013 #24

why do you say that? Edim May 2013 #26

so you echo and support the OP yet you don't reply to him once CreekDog May 2013 #59

I don't find it odd. Edim May 2013 #62

Unless we start acknowledging reality... Nederland May 2013 #36

Nature will win the argument. Edim May 2013 #73

finally replied to the OP after all this time, you took my advice! CreekDog May 2013 #83

already blocked from the Environment and Energy group for climate denial nonsense CreekDog May 2013 #48

it only shows Edim May 2013 #55

scientific consensus isn't a "bandwagon" CreekDog May 2013 #57

There's no hysteria about plate tectonics Edim May 2013 #60

True Nederland May 2013 #76

Surely you're not a troll out to disrupt this website. Apophis May 2013 #95

perfectly timed to echo the OP's message almost word for word CreekDog May 2013 #49

Oh, and in case anyone says this is a convenient NEW theory: Junkdrawer May 2013 #17

better safe than sorry........ let's reduce them as much as we THINK we might need -nt- Takket May 2013 #15

no one is reducing anything Edim May 2013 #21

pffft yeah i kind of forgot that point... Takket May 2013 #23

it's not meaningless Edim May 2013 #27

This is from the Daily Mail ananda May 2013 #28

Yes, consider the source Nederland May 2013 #31

What data? Viking12 May 2013 #41

The data in post #8 Nederland May 2013 #43

LOL. Nice dodge. Viking12 May 2013 #44

I think you are confused... Nederland May 2013 #71

Nope. Viking12 May 2013 #79

Wrong Nederland May 2013 #92

tell me about this magical sequestration machine Allen proposes Viking12 May 2013 #93

Sourcewatch says Daily Mail "publishes articles promoting a climate change skeptic view" Factfriendly McFact May 2013 #32

Ad hominem fallacy Nederland May 2013 #40

Credibility of the source (or lack thereof) is relevant, which is why you refer to us as "deniers" CreekDog May 2013 #86

Can I ask you something? blogslut May 2013 #33

If they really cost less... Nederland May 2013 #35

Why do governments subsidize the oil companies? nt joeybee12 May 2013 #38

Politics Nederland May 2013 #42

because non renewables aren't as cheap as their pricetag CreekDog May 2013 #47

True Nederland May 2013 #75

because the damage burning non renewables is not factored into the cost of them CreekDog May 2013 #84

Thanks for the post from one of Murdoch's rags...those always have joeybee12 May 2013 #37

Scientists do science, not economics Viking12 May 2013 #39

more denial? CreekDog May 2013 #46

Extraordinarily interesting..... Junkdrawer May 2013 #52

thank you CreekDog May 2013 #61

This one has been making "contributions" here for a very long time. Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #56

and he seems to have a new friend here to echo all his skepticism of climate change CreekDog May 2013 #58

I tried to get the folks in EE out of their denial Nederland May 2013 #69

The Arctic is projected to be ice-free in 10 years NickB79 May 2013 #51

That's a really optimistic projection XemaSab May 2013 #53

Do you really expect us to believe you meant these words sincerely? CreekDog May 2013 #54

I've never been a denier Nederland May 2013 #72

Sure you have been a denier and here you are trying to mislead by calling believers deniers CreekDog May 2013 #81

Are you saying I have a sock puppet? Nederland May 2013 #90

what an odd response CreekDog May 2013 #91

I'm sure people with socks know how to escape techological detection, but what they can't do... CreekDog May 2013 #96

When you can't serve up the denial BS in E&E....... marmar May 2013 #66

Classic example of what is wrong with EE Nederland May 2013 #70

Funny, I don't see "BILLIONS" being spent.. SomethingFishy May 2013 #80

yes. If anything we are wasting billions by ignoring it and KurtNYC May 2013 #82

Areas that are being reclaimed by the sea? Nederland May 2013 #88

A couple KurtNYC May 2013 #94

Three Points Nederland Jun 2013 #97

You must not be paying attention Nederland May 2013 #89

The phrases "banality of evil" and "willing executioners" come to mind. Iterate May 2013 #87