Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

RainDog

(28,784 posts)

10. this is a family health care issue

Reply to targetpractice (Original post)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:03 AM

Feb 2012

because pregnancy impacts both a wife and a husband and any other children they have. obviously people who attend the religious services of this institution ALL OVER THE WORLD do not follow this demand to ignore one's family responsibility because of some person who has never been married trying to tell the world how it should have sex or a family.

honestly.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Framing this "birth control coverage" issue... [View all] targetpractice Feb 2012 OP

+1000 seeviewonder Feb 2012 #1

You're right... targetpractice Feb 2012 #3

Very well said...n/t seeviewonder Feb 2012 #12

I like you're thinking progress2k12nbynd Feb 2012 #2

Drat... I forgot about that carve out. n/t targetpractice Feb 2012 #4

Oddly I disagree with you SmileyRose Feb 2012 #5

Perhaps I was too inarticulate... targetpractice Feb 2012 #6

Didn't health care insurance companies decide that was revenue nuetral? I was pretty brewens Feb 2012 #7

Lawrence O'Donnell pointed it out on his show Wednesday night. Tx4obama Feb 2012 #8

Thank you, thank you! targetpractice Feb 2012 #9

this is a family health care issue RainDog Feb 2012 #10

Offer partial opt-out only Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #11