General Discussion

Robb

(39,665 posts)

11. Not in Tennessee. And other employment-at-will states.

Reply to X_Digger (Reply #10)

Wed May 29, 2013, 09:44 PM

May 2013

That's rather the entire point of the article.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When gunnuttery and anti-unionism collide: Howdy, Tennessee! [View all] Robb May 2013 OP

Is The Pop-Corn Franchise Available, Sir? The Magistrate May 2013 #1

The invisible hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Robb May 2013 #4

Sure, extra butter is $0.75. Initech May 2013 #42

It seems that the store owner's property rights trump the gun-owner's carrying rights. antigone382 May 2013 #2

No.. it's about car owner property rights v employers. X_Digger May 2013 #5

But employers DO have billh58 May 2013 #7

So you'd be cool with a 'no bibles' or 'no DU bumperstickers' rule? How about.. X_Digger May 2013 #8

I didn't say that billh58 May 2013 #9

You didn't say it.. then you proceed to say it. LOL! X_Digger May 2013 #10

Not in Tennessee. And other employment-at-will states. Robb May 2013 #11

You're basing this on an AG's opinion in an untested premise? Okaay. X_Digger May 2013 #19

You gunners are certainly billh58 May 2013 #12

LOL, if you say so. X_Digger May 2013 #16

If you say so billh58 May 2013 #26

Any reason? Think again. X_Digger May 2013 #29

In a right to work billh58 May 2013 #31

Ahh, but 'no reason' is not 'for any reason' as you said. X_Digger May 2013 #32

Not walking anything billh58 May 2013 #35

This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast May 2013 #40

You should walk it back, as he was correct and you were not friendly_iconoclast May 2013 #43

So there are no EEOC charges in those states? Fascinating. ;) n/t X_Digger May 2013 #44

"At will employment" means you can be fired for any unprotected reason. Brickbat May 2013 #36

You are misstating the law. former9thward May 2013 #34

Define objectionable. rrneck May 2013 #28

And again, we are billh58 May 2013 #33

I was born and raised in that state rrneck May 2013 #38

Growing up the sixties... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2013 #46

The clear intent of billh58 May 2013 #3

Hah! Search Google News for: fired employee "returned with a gun"... friendly_iconoclast May 2013 #13

How many does it say billh58 May 2013 #18

That also means there's no way to gague the effectiveness of bans on guns in parking lots. friendly_iconoclast May 2013 #23

Let's see now billh58 May 2013 #30

Inconveniencing people "for the public good"-where else have we seen such a mindset? Oh yeah: friendly_iconoclast May 2013 #39

Right. What could possibly go wrong as a result of this bill? SharonAnn May 2013 #14

How many permit holders have been caught drinking? X_Digger May 2013 #21

The "If it only saves *one* life" meme is strong in this thread, isn't it? friendly_iconoclast May 2013 #25

That is disturbing, yep. X_Digger May 2013 #27

Carrying guns in bars is legal in quite a few states, actually. friendly_iconoclast May 2013 #24

Hmmm. Employees will be packing heat on their employer's property. madinmaryland May 2013 #6

Indeed, Sir The Magistrate May 2013 #15

Also, Sir madinmaryland May 2013 #17

If We Are To Have An Armed Populace, Sir The Magistrate May 2013 #20

This is the law in several right to work states. aikoaiko May 2013 #22

Um, you can have it both ways. You can't fire people due to race, even in states with at will laws The Straight Story May 2013 #37

What you have stated billh58 May 2013 #45

Wow, billh58 May 2013 #41