Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
44. Jacob Javits was hardly a "Rockefeller." He was a liberal, though.
Thu May 30, 2013, 01:47 PM
May 2013

The whole "Rockefeller" term was used by sneering Republicans to describe the liberal wing of the GOP, it was an effort to denigrate them that came from within their OWN party.

Democrats called those guys "allies" on a number of issues--but that was back in the day when people could work across the aisle in an honorable way.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_K._Javits

During his first two terms in the House, Javits often sided with the Harry Truman administration. For example, in 1947 he supported Truman's veto of the Taft-Hartley Bill, which he declared was antiunion. A strong opponent of discrimination, Javits also endorsed anti-poll tax legislation in 1947 and 1949, and in 1954 he unsuccessfully sought to have enacted a bill banning segregation in federally funded housing projects. Unhappy with the witch hunt atmosphere in Washington during the Cold War, he publicly opposed continuing appropriations for the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1948. Always a staunch supporter of Israel, Javits served on the House Foreign Affairs Committee during all four of his terms and supported congressional funding for the Marshall Plan and all components of the Truman Doctrine.

In 1954 Javits ran for New York State Attorney General against a well-known and well-funded opponent, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jr. Javits's vote-getting abilities carried the day, and he was the only Republican to win a statewide office that year. As attorney general, Javits continued to promote his liberal agenda, supporting such measures as antibias employment legislation and a health insurance program for state employees.

...Upon taking office, Javits resumed his role as the most outspoken Republican liberal in Congress. For the next twenty-four years the Senate was Javits's home. His wife had no interest in living in Washington, D.C., a town she considered a boring backwater, so for over two decades Javits commuted between New York and Washington nearly every week to visit his "other" family and conduct local political business. During his first term he supported the limited 1957 Civil Rights Act, which was bitterly opposed by many of his southern colleagues. In foreign affairs he backed the Eisenhower Doctrine for the Middle East and also pressed for more foreign military and economic assistance.

Re-elected in 1962 and 1968, he supported Lyndon Johnson's civil rights measures and generally endorsed the Great Society programs. To promote his views on social legislation, he served on the Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee for twenty years, most of that time as the second-ranking minority member. Javits initially backed Johnson during the early years of America's involvement in the Vietnam War, supporting, for example, the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964. By the end of 1967, however, he was becoming disenchanted with the war's progress[3] and joined twenty-two other senators in calling for a peaceful solution to the conflict. By 1970 his rising opposition to the war led him to support the Cooper-Church Amendment, which barred funds for U.S. troops in Cambodia, and he also voted to repeal the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. Increasingly concerned about the erosion of congressional authority in foreign affairs, Javits sponsored the 1973 War Powers Act, which limited to sixty days a president's ability to send American armed forces into combat without congressional approval. Despite his unhappiness with President Richard Nixon over the Vietnam War, Javits was slow to join the anti-Nixon forces during the Watergate scandal of 1973-1974. Until almost the very end of the affair, Javits's position reflected his legal training: Nixon was innocent until proven guilty, and the best way to determine guilt or innocence was by legal due process. Javits's position was not popular among his constituency, and his re-election in 1974 over Ramsey Clark was by fewer than 400,000 votes, a third of his 1968 margin of victory. During his last term Javits shifted his interests more and more to world affairs, especially the crises in the Middle East. Working with President Jimmy Carter, he journeyed to Israel and Egypt to facilitate discussions that led to the 1978 Camp David Accords.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I welcome any and all to make the 80-20 a reality. I am extending my hand to all... graham4anything May 2013 #1
Rhode Island Democrats need to say "no" to Chaffee. Scuba May 2013 #2
Did you like his vote against the IWR? How about all his votes for choice? cali May 2013 #3
Yes, I remember him as pretty darn liberal and always wondered why he didn't switch jwirr May 2013 #9
Privatization of Social Security zipplewrath May 2013 #12
name a so-called moderate republican in elected office cali May 2013 #19
They've all joined the democratic party zipplewrath May 2013 #24
How dare you introduce facts... SidDithers May 2013 #16
He's always been more liberal than a lot of Democrats. nt geek tragedy May 2013 #4
The head count is important. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2013 #5
Numbers matter in 2014. Ideologies can be dealt with better as a majority SoCalDem May 2013 #6
I thought he was running for re-election as Governor hfojvt May 2013 #14
oopsie.. I thought he was running for a senate seat.. SoCalDem May 2013 #17
He's running for reelection as governor of RI...2nd term. nt MADem May 2013 #32
It's New England. Jennicut May 2013 #7
+1 Blue_Tires May 2013 #8
Not much of a ringing endorsement zipplewrath May 2013 #13
He is quite liberal as gov in RI. Jennicut May 2013 #20
Yet perfectly comfortable int he GOP for years zipplewrath May 2013 #26
You should really research the guy before you make smug remarks like that. MADem May 2013 #33
Post WWII zipplewrath May 2013 #38
It doesn't matter when the GOP started getting weird. The liberal branch in the northeast didn't MADem May 2013 #43
'90s zipplewrath May 2013 #47
Who? I'll take some names, please. MADem May 2013 #52
Southern Democrats zipplewrath May 2013 #58
People who left the party in the 90s were not Dixiecrats. They were corporatists MADem May 2013 #63
You're making my case zipplewrath May 2013 #64
No I am not. Parties only move in order to gain in numbers. MADem May 2013 #69
You have no idea what liberal is zipplewrath May 2013 #73
Look who's talking! MADem May 2013 #74
You mean he wasn't in the GOP for 8 years zipplewrath May 2013 #75
He was placed in that seat as a GOP replacement for a dead Republican. MADem May 2013 #81
Alot of reprublicans did zipplewrath May 2013 #86
Ed Brooke also called the modern GOP out on its bedsheet racism KamaAina May 2013 #40
social liberal-fiscal conservative hfojvt May 2013 #22
Used to call them zipplewrath May 2013 #31
Jacob Javits was hardly a "Rockefeller." He was a liberal, though. MADem May 2013 #44
Well, that's the larger point zipplewrath May 2013 #46
Yes, they were small d democratic 'liberals.' What more do you want? MADem May 2013 #49
Not all of them were zipplewrath May 2013 #54
What you are claiming is just not true. MADem May 2013 #61
The party for liberals zipplewrath May 2013 #62
You are not entitled to your own facts. MADem May 2013 #67
You seem to miss the point entirely zipplewrath May 2013 #68
It IS a purity test. MADem May 2013 #70
You're making things up zipplewrath May 2013 #77
I am not the one who married Chafee to Newt and put him in Congress in the eighties, MADem May 2013 #80
Fiscal Conservatism is not entirely a bad thing. Ikonoklast May 2013 #41
Howard Dean has some of that fiscal conservatism working...and he's a liberal. MADem May 2013 #55
Howard is suprisingly moderate on many issues. Ikonoklast May 2013 #57
Precious few at all zipplewrath May 2013 #59
Gore is a moderate too, but his big 'liberal' cause was the environment. MADem May 2013 #71
Many people don't get that New England once had very moderate Repubs that would be considered Dems Jennicut May 2013 #15
I'd still rather elect a Dem hfojvt May 2013 #21
I would say Chaffee is pretty much to the left on taxes Jennicut May 2013 #23
but other than the restaurant tax hfojvt May 2013 #28
Most of the things that are objectionable about him are irrelevant in the Governor's mansion. stevenleser May 2013 #10
Chafee's a good guy. He's more liberal than a lot of Democrats. Arkana May 2013 #11
He was a co-chair of Obama's re-election campaign...so POTUS liked him OK. MADem May 2013 #34
I've always like Chaffee Marrah_G May 2013 #18
If you can't spell his name correctly, I assume you don't know anything about him CreekDog May 2013 #25
All this does is pull Democrats more to the right. AndyA May 2013 #27
Do you actually know anything about Chafee or are you just knee-jerking? Arkana May 2013 #35
Blue blood raised in a gilded world of privilege AndyA May 2013 #39
You aren't thrilled because you don't know anything about the guy. nt MADem May 2013 #29
He supported gay marriage as a republican in 2004. I always liked him. hrmjustin May 2013 #30
I don't know much about the guy. HappyMe May 2013 #36
This or the Ford emblem thread.... whistler162 May 2013 #37
He was a liberal Republican, and once upon a time there were a lot more of them. struggle4progress May 2013 #42
Particularly since he endorsed Obama's 2008 run and was co-chair of his reelection campaign!! MADem May 2013 #45
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #48
Welcome to DU... SidDithers May 2013 #51
Welcome to DU my friend! hrmjustin May 2013 #53
Lincoln Chaffee voted against the Iraq invasion when many Democrats voted for it. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #50
Well done. He knows the coat tails he needs to cling to. Fearless May 2013 #56
And you know this how? They voted for Whitehouse who is probably one of the most Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #65
Because when choosing between a DINO and a Democrat Fearless May 2013 #66
consequence of the republican move to the right booley May 2013 #60
Exactly zipplewrath May 2013 #79
He wants to privatize Social Security. FUCK HIM. He is NO Democrat no forestpath May 2013 #72
Good point, did not realize that still_one May 2013 #78
Something he will not be involved in either way in the Governors mansion of a state. nt stevenleser May 2013 #82
Oh, that makes it all better. forestpath May 2013 #83
It does, actually. nt stevenleser May 2013 #85
Actual he is better than some blue dog democrats still_one May 2013 #76
The few remaining New England R's are as liberal as the median D Recursion May 2013 #84
I welcome him with open arms. WI_DEM May 2013 #87
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lincoln Chaffee (? Rhode ...»Reply #44