Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: do we really need a money system? [View all]Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)76. A little OT, but in a similar vein:
Good questions in the OP, and this is an interesting thing I didn't know that goes into the debt aspect of our currency:
Most Americans have no idea that the U.S. government once issued debt-free money directly into circulation. America once thrived under a debt-free monetary system, and we can do it again. The truth is that the United States is a sovereign nation and it does not need to borrow money from anyone. Back in the days of JFK, Federal Reserve Notes were not the only currency in circulation. Under JFK (at at various other times), a limited number of debt-free United States Notes were issued by the U.S. Treasury and spent by the U.S. government without any new debt being created. In fact, each bill said "United States Note" right at the top. Unfortunately, United States Notes are not being issued today. If you stop right now and pull a dollar out of your wallet, what does it say right at the top? It says "Federal Reserve Note".
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/debt-free-united-states-notes-were-once-issued-under-jfk-and-the-u-s-government-still-has-the-power-to-issue-debt-free-money
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
153 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think it means I grow the poster food and you provide whatever else they need
loli phabay
May 2013
#85
Barter is a myth. The 'barter system' that is found in the first chapter of any intro to economics
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#15
No, but yes. Currency makes a complex and expansive economy possible, so we really do need it
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#4
I just can't picture an advanced civilization from another planet using tokens.
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2013
#5
The token is not the problem. The rules are the problem. We can change the rules. nt
CJCRANE
May 2013
#20
All of our oldest archeological finds have shown our nature is to form communities...
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2013
#40
It just needs to be spread around more evenly. Here's something I wrote previously on that topic:
CJCRANE
May 2013
#6
the point was that someone will still have to work to produce what the op wants
loli phabay
May 2013
#83
well i am more cynical knowing the world as i do, yes some people will sacrifice for others
loli phabay
May 2013
#101
Buying art materials motivates you. Other people have children, that motivates them
CJCRANE
May 2013
#124
silly season. people that think that without money or religion or whatever, evil would
cali
May 2013
#11
I would get rid of paper money and coins. I myself only use $4 bucks a week in cash.
graham4anything
May 2013
#25
Still don't need cash for that. All of that could be harnessed by other methods of energy.
graham4anything
May 2013
#114
when the earth is owned by labor and there is joy and peace for all in the workers' commonwealth
Douglas Carpenter
May 2013
#30
I think the point is that you and I should be and then we support the poster
loli phabay
May 2013
#58
Perhaps if the human race had never gone down the money road it could have happened.
raouldukelives
May 2013
#59
You say that dancing for the gods is working, that the sacrafice is worthwhile...
hunter
May 2013
#136
I'm happy with my apples, thank you. Sometimes a little ugly, but 100% organic.
hunter
May 2013
#143
Sometimes they did, sometimes they didn't, depending on the need of the script of the moment.
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#123
If everyone in the world had "a decent home car T.V.", we'd need to produce a lot more
muriel_volestrangler
May 2013
#70
Not necessarily more, just different. The volumes of production we currently have are sufficient to
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#121
All this means is that you are burning through your all-to-short life toiling for someone else's
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#97
Why? Because you say so? You don't know anybody that loves building machines, none of your neighbors
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#103
Your lack of imagination does not constitute a limit on what is possible. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#105
Why not just compete against the nature and death and aging rather than against each other?
konzay
Jan 2015
#150
What would the government need to raise money for if there was no money? nt
limpyhobbler
Jun 2013
#147
Uh, rich people need it, else they won't get to keep everything for doing nothing. nt
valerief
Jan 2015
#153